ArticleIntensive care medicine2010
Central neurological complications in critically ill patients with malignancies.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in critically ill cancer patients' short-term outcome over the last decades: results of systematic review with meta-analysis on individual data.Intensive care medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Influence of neutropenia on mortality of critically ill cancer patients: results of a meta-analysis on individual data.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Acute neurological dysfunction in critically ill patients with solid tumors: A 14-year retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Neurological failure in ICU patients with hematological malignancies: A prospective cohort study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Critically ill allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients in the intensive care unit: reappraisal of actual prognosis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Review
- Spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in critically ill patients with malignancies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Intensive care of the cancer patient: recent achievements and remaining challenges.Annals of intensive care · 2011Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2010: I. Acute renal failure, outcome, risk assessment and ICU performance, sepsis, neuro intensive care and experimentals.Intensive care medicine · 2011Article
- Open the doors of the ICU to patients with malignancies and neurological complications.Intensive care medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine outcomes in critically ill patients hospitalized in the ICU for central neurological complications of cancer. DESIGN AND
settingA 7-year retrospective study. SUBJECT AND
interventionObservational study in 100 critically ill cancer patients with central neurological complications managed using standardized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsThere were 52 men and 48 women, aged 55 years (IQR, 40-65). Presenting manifestations were coma (56%), epilepsy (48%), focal signs (35%), encephalopathy (31%), and meningitis (7%). Cerebral imaging was abnormal in 61 patients, lumbar puncture in 17, and electroencephalography in 6. Neurosurgical biopsy was performed on four patients. The main etiologies included drug toxicity in 28, malignant brain infiltration in 21 patients, and cerebrovascular disease in 20. Mechanical ventilation was needed for 60 patients. Anticancer chemotherapy was administered during the ICU stay in 15 patients. ICU and hospital mortalities were 28 and 45%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, independent positive predictors of hospital mortality were poor performance status [odds ratio (OR) 2.94, 95% CI, 1.01-8.55, P = 0.047), focal signs at presentation (OR 3.52, 95% CI, 1.14-10.88, P = 0.029), abnormal lumbar puncture (OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.09-27.66, P = 0.038), and need for vasoactive drugs (OR 6.47, 95% CI 1.32-31.66, P = 0.021), whereas remission of the malignancy (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.88, P = 0.033) and GCS score at admission (OR 0.81/point, 95% CI, 0.70-0.95, P = 0.009) were negative predictors of hospital mortality.
conclusionIn cancer patients, central neurological events are mainly related to malignant brain infiltration and drug-related toxicity. Despite advanced severity, a standardized intensive management strategy yields a 55% hospital survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.