Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19907434›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2009

The role of supercoiling in transcriptional control of MYC and its importance in molecular therapeutics.

Tracy A Brooks, Laurence H Hurley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural basis for nucleolin recognition ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Manipulating Myc for reparative regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tracy A BrooksCollege of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Laurence H Hurley

Funding

SPORE in Gastrointestinal CancerP50CA095060 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GERNER, EUGENE W · 2002 to 2012
$25.3M
Establishing a molecular system for drug targeting of transcriptional controlR01GM085585 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HURLEY, LAURENCE H. · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
G-quadruplexes formed in human oncogene promoters and their drug complexesR01CA122952 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI YANG, DANZHOU · 2007 to 2011
$875k
NCI NIH HHS CA122952NCI NIH HHS CA95060NIGMS NIH HHS GM085585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MYC is deregulated in most tumour types, but an effective means to selectively target its aberrant expression is not yet available. Supercoiling that is induced by transcription has been demonstrated to have dynamic effects on DNA in the MYC promoter element: it converts duplex DNA to non-duplex DNA structures, even at considerable distances from the transcriptional start site. These non-duplex DNA structures, which control both turning on and off of transcription and the rate of transcription firing, are amenable to small-molecule targeting. This dynamic system provides a unique opportunity for the treatment of tumours in which MYC is an important oncogene.

Indexed as

DNA, SuperhelicalDrug Delivery SystemsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, mycDrug DesignHumansNeoplasmsPromoter Regions, GeneticProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycDNA, SuperhelicalProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID19907434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.