Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19906919›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

The full-length isoform of human papillomavirus 16 E6 and its splice variant E6* bind to different sites on the procaspase 8 death effector domain.

Sandy S Tungteakkhun, Maria Filippova, Nadja Fodor, Penelope J Duerksen-Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Alternative splicing in the genome of HPV and its regulation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Apoptotic caspases suppress an MDA5-driven IFN response during productive replication of human papillomavirus type 31.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Analysis of the current status of research on human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancers based on recent Chinese literature].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2017
    Review
  14. Subtypes of HPV-Positive Head and Neck Cancers Are Associated with HPV Characteristics, Copy Number Alterations, PIK3CA Mutation, and Pathway Signatures.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandy S TungteakkhunDepartment of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11085 Campus Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Maria Filippova
Nadja Fodor
Penelope J Duerksen-Hughes
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

Inhibition of the TNF Apoptotic Pathway by HPV 16 E6R01CA095461 · NCI · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI DUERKSEN-HUGHES, PENELOPE J · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA-095461NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus 16 is a causative agent of most cases of cervical cancer and has also been implicated in the development of some head and neck cancers. The early viral E6 gene codes for two alternatively spliced isoforms, E6(large) and E6*. We have previously demonstrated the differential effects of E6(large) and E6* binding on the expression and stability of procaspase 8, a key mediator of the apoptotic pathway. Additionally, we have reported that E6 binds to the FADD death effector domain (DED) at a novel E6 binding domain. Sequence similarities between the FADD and procaspase 8 DEDs suggested a specific region for E6(large)/procaspase 8 binding, which was subsequently confirmed by mutational analysis as well as by the ability of peptides capable of blocking E6/FADD binding to also block E6(large)/caspase 8 binding. However, the binding of the smaller isoform, E6*, to procaspase 8 occurs at a different region, as deletion and point mutations that disrupt E6(large)/caspase 8 DED binding do not disrupt E6*/caspase 8 DED binding. In addition, peptide inhibitors that can block E6(large)/procaspase 8 binding do not affect the binding of E6* to procaspase 8. These results demonstrate that the residues that mediate E6*/procaspase 8 DED binding localize to a different region on the protein and employ a separate binding motif. This provides a molecular explanation for our initial findings that the two E6 isoforms affect procaspase 8 stability in an opposing manner.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingApoptosisBinding SitesBlotting, WesternCaspase 8Cell Line, TumorElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansOncogene Proteins, ViralRepressor ProteinsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCaspase 8E6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralRepressor ProteinsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID19906919
PMCPMC2812347
OpenAlexW2137537680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.