Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19904263›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2009

Multicentre phase II studies evaluating imatinib plus hydroxyurea in patients with progressive glioblastoma.

D A Reardon, G Dresemann, S Taillibert, M Campone, M van den Bent, P Clement, E Blomquist, L Gordower, H Schultz, J Raizer and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.

D A ReardonThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3624, Durham, NC 27710, USA. reard003@mc.duke.edu
G Dresemann
S Taillibert
M Campone
M van den Bent
P Clement
E Blomquist
L Gordower
H Schultz
J Raizer
P Hau
J Easaw
M Gil
J Tonn
A Gijtenbeek
U Schlegel
P Bergstrom
S Green
A Weir
Z Nikolova
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHAarhus University Hospital · DKDuke University · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut Génétique Nantes Atlantique · FRLMU Klinikum · DENorthwestern University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSorbonne Université · FRUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity Hospital of Umeå · SEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the efficacy of imatinib mesylate in addition to hydroxyurea in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) who were either on or not on enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAEDs).

methodsA total of 231 patients with GBM at first recurrence from 21 institutions in 10 countries were enrolled. All patients received 500 mg of hydroxyurea twice a day. Imatinib was administered at 600 mg per day for patients not on EIAEDs and at 500 mg twice a day if on EIAEDs. The primary end point was radiographic response rate and secondary end points were safety, progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6), and overall survival (OS).

resultsThe radiographic response rate after centralised review was 3.4%. Progression-free survival at 6 months and median OS were 10.6% and 26.0 weeks, respectively. Outcome did not appear to differ based on EIAED status. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events were fatigue (7%), neutropaenia (7%), and thrombocytopaenia (7%).

conclusionsImatinib in addition to hydroxyurea was well tolerated among patients with recurrent GBM but did not show clinically meaningful anti-tumour activity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansHydroxyureaImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesAdrenal Cortex HormonesBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorHydroxyureaImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID19904263
PMCPMC2795431
OpenAlexW2127445947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.