Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19903753›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2010

Epidemiological perspectives on type 1 diabetes in childhood and adolescence in germany: 20 years of the Baden-württemberg Diabetes Incidence Registry (DIARY).

Stefan Ehehalt, Klaus Dietz, Andre M Willasch, Andreas Neu, Baden-Württemberg Diabetes Incidence Registry (DIARY) Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current developments in nutrition · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. The Prevalence and Incidence of Diabetes in Germany.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  17. Gut Microbiota: A Contributing Factor to Obesity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan EhehaltUniversity Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.
Klaus Dietz
Andre M Willasch
Andreas Neu
Baden-Württemberg Diabetes Incidence Registry (DIARY) Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo predict the frequency of type 1 diabetes in childhood and adolescence (<15 years of age) in Germany for the next 20 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsData on diabetes onset has been collected by means of a registry in the federal German state of Baden-Württemberg (documentation period, 1987-2006; n = 5,108; completeness of data 98.1%).

resultsThe current incidence rate (2000-2006) is 19.4 per 100,000 per year (95% CI 18.6-20.2). The annual incidence rate can be expressed as a square of a linear function of the calendar year X [y = (3.05 + 0.0778 x {X-1986})(2); r(2) = 0.90]. The highest increase per year was observed in the age-groups comprising 2- and 3-year-olds (12 and 13% per year, respectively). The incidence rate for the year 2026 is estimated to be 37.9 per 100,000 per year (95% CI 33.3-42.9).

conclusionsThe increase that we found in younger children is characteristic of a left shift toward an earlier age.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1DocumentationEmigration and ImmigrationFinlandGermanyHumansIncidencePredictive Value of TestsRegistriesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID19903753
PMCPMC2809277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.