Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19903070›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2009

Role of CSF-1 in progression of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Setsuko K Chambers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hallmarks of cancer and AU-rich elements.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Setsuko K ChambersWomen's Cancers, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. schambers@azcc.arizona.edu
University of Arizona · US

Funding

REGULATION OF CSF 1 AND UROKINASE IN OVARIAN CANCERR29CA060665 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMBERS, SETSUKO KUKI · 1995 to 1999
–
CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO OVARIAN CANCERR55CA060665 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMBERS, SETSUKO KUKI · 1993 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS CA60665NCI NIH HHS R29 CA060665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the dismal outcome seen in the majority of epithelial ovarian cancer patients, there is ongoing progress in understanding the disease at a molecular level. Elucidation of pathways underlying disease progression and metastasis of ovarian cancer is key to development of targeted therapeutics. It is only in this way that therapeutic potential can be translated to reality. Here, we describe the evidence to date for the role of CSF-1/c-fms signaling in ovarian cancer invasiveness and metastasis, including the recent understanding of how CSF-1/c-fms expression is regulated with identification of significant post-transcriptional regulators.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionFemaleHumansMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsSignal TransductionMacrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID19903070
PMCPMC2830097
OpenAlexW2043492786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.