Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19902297›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2010

Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Stephen Y Kang, Deborah J Colesa, Donald L Swiderski, Gina L Su, Yehoash Raphael, Bryan E Pfingst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06375278 (Device to Deliver Intra-Operative Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06375278 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Device to Deliver Intra-Operative Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRestorear Devices LLCRan2024 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsCochlear Implants, Cochlear Implantation, Hearing LossArmsIntra-Ear Canal Cooling Catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and speech perception outcomes post-cochlear implantation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  15. Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Anatomical Correlates and Surgical Considerations for Localized Therapeutic Hypothermia Application in Cochlear Implantation Surgery.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen Y KangKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
Deborah J Colesa
Donald L Swiderski
Gina L Su
Yehoash Raphael
Bryan E Pfingst

Funding

Scientific Synergy CoreP30DC005188 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLAN, DAVID FRANCIS · 2002 to 2016
$10.3M
Advanced Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC005356 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CORFAS, GABRIEL · 2002 to 2021
$3.5M
CORTICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO COCHLEAR IMPLANTSR01DC004312 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MIDDLEBROOKS, JOHN C · 2000 to 2010
$2.5M
Acoustic and electrical hearing after Atoh1 treatmentR01DC007634 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005188NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC05188NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004312NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007634NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005356NIDCD NIH HHS T32DC005356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear implant function to improve speech recognition in noise as well as perception of music. The current study had two primary objectives. First, we sought to determine how cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation over a time period of 14 to 21 months influence cochlear structures such as hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. Second, we sought to investigate whether the structures that provide acoustic hearing also affect the perception of electrical stimulation. We compared psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation in two groups of adult guinea pigs. Group I (11 animals) received a cochlear implant in a previously untreated ear, while group II (ten animals) received a cochlear implant in an ear that had been previously infused with neomycin to destroy hearing. Psychophysical thresholds were measured in response to pulse-train and sinusoidal stimuli. Histological analysis of all group I animals and a subset of group II animals was performed. Nine of the 11 group I animals showed survival of the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion neurons adjacent to the electrode array. All group I animals showed survival of these elements in regions apical to the electrode array. Group II animals that were examined histologically showed complete loss of the organ of Corti in regions adjacent and apical to the electrode array and severe spiral ganglion neuron loss, consistent with previous reports for neomycin-treated ears. Behaviorally, group II animals had significantly lower thresholds than group I animals in response to 100 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. However, group I animals had significantly lower thresholds than group II animals in response to pulse-train stimuli (0.02 ms/phase; 156 to 5,000 pps). Additionally, the two groups showed distinct threshold versus pulse rate functions. We hypothesize that the differences in detection thresholds between groups are caused by the electrical activation of the hair cells in group I animals and/or differences between groups in the condition of the spiral ganglion neurons.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationDeafnessPsychoacousticsAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCell SurvivalConditioning, PsychologicalElectric ImpedanceElectric StimulationGuinea PigsHair Cells, Auditory, InnerHair Cells, Auditory, OuterHearingMaleNeomycinOrgan of CortiNeomycinProtein Synthesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19902297
PMCPMC2862914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.