Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19901310›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Health care assistants in primary care depression management: role perception, burdening factors, and disease conception.

Jochen Gensichen, Cornelia Jaeger, Monika Peitz, Marion Torge, Corina Güthlin, Karola Mergenthal, Vera Kleppel, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Juliana J Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shared Decision Making Enhances Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in Adult Patients in Outpatient Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jochen GensichenInstitute for General Practice, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Bachstr. 18, D-07740, Jena, Germany. jochen.gensichen@med.uni-jena.de
Cornelia Jaeger
Monika Peitz
Marion Torge
Corina Güthlin
Karola Mergenthal
Vera Kleppel
Ferdinand M Gerlach
Juliana J Petersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn primary care, the involvement of health care assistants (HCAs) in clinical depression management is an innovative approach. Little is known, however, about how HCAs experience their new tasks. We wanted to describe the perceptions and experiences of HCAs who provided case management to patients with depression in small primary care practices.

methodsThis qualitative study was nested in the Primary Care Monitoring for Depressive Patients Trial on case management in Germany. We used a semi-structured instrument to interview 26 HCAs and undertook content analysis. We focussed on 3 key aspects: role perception, burdening factors, and disease conception.

resultsMost HCAs said their new role provided them with personal and professional enrichment, and they were interested in improving patient-communication skills. They saw their major function as interacting with the patient and considered support for the family physician to be of less importance. Even so, some saw their role as a communication facilitator between family physician and patient. Burdening factors implementing the new tasks were the increased workload, the work environment, and difficulties interacting with depressed patients. HCAs' disease conception of depression was heterogeneous. After 1 year HCAs believed they were sufficiently familiar with their duties as case managers in depression management.

conclusionHCAs were willing to extend their professional responsibilities from administrative work to more patient-centred work. Even if HCAs perform only monitoring tasks within the case management concept, the resulting workload is a limiting factor.

Indexed as

Practice Management, MedicalPrimary Health CareAdultAllied Health PersonnelAttitude of Health PersonnelCase ManagementDepressive DisorderFemaleGermanyHumansJob SatisfactionRole

Identifiers

PMID19901310
PMCPMC2775615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.