Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19900962›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2011

Preventing the second episode: a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial and pharmacological trials in first-episode psychosis.

Mario Alvarez-Jiménez, Alexandra G Parker, Sarah E Hetrick, Patrick D McGorry, John F Gleeson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05703698 (EEG Outcomes From Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05703698 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

EEG Outcomes From Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsPsychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia and Related DisordersArmsCognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mario Alvarez-JiménezDepartment of Psychiatry, Marques de Valdecilla Public Foundation–Research Institute (FMV-IFIMAV) Av. Valdecilla s/n, 39009, Santander, Spain. malvarez@unimelb.edu.au
Alexandra G Parker
Sarah E Hetrick
Patrick D McGorry
John F Gleeson
Orygen Youth Health · AUFundación Marques de Valdecilla · ESMelbourne Health · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe majority of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients reach clinical remission; however, rates of relapse are high. This study sought to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent relapse in FEP patients.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

resultsOf 66 studies retrieved, 18 were eligible for inclusion. Nine studies investigated psychosocial interventions and 9 pharmacological treatments. The analysis of 3 RCTs of psychosocial interventions comparing specialist FEP programs vs treatment as usual involving 679 patients demonstrated the former to be more effective in preventing relapse (odds ratio [OR]=1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.31-2.48; P<.001; number needed to treat [NNT]=10). While the analysis of 3 different cognitive-behavioral studies not specifically intended at preventing relapse showed no further benefits compared with specialist FEP programs (OR=1.95, 95% CI=0.76-5.00; P=.17), the combination of specific individual and family intervention targeted at relapse prevention may further improve upon these outcomes (OR=4.88, 95% CI=0.97-24.60; P=.06). Only 3 small studies compared first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) with placebo with no significant differences regarding relapse prevention although all individual estimates favored FGAs (OR=2.82, 95% CI=0.54-14.75; P=.22). Exploratory analysis involving 1055 FEP patients revealed that relapse rates were significantly lower with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) compared with FGAs (OR=1.47, 95% CI=1.07-2.01; P<.02; NNT=10).

conclusionsSpecialist FEP programs are effective in preventing relapse. Cognitive-based individual and family interventions may need to specifically target relapse to obtain relapse prevention benefits that extend beyond those provided by specialist FEP programs. Overall, the available data suggest that FGAs and SGAs have the potential to reduce relapse rates. Future trials should examine the effectiveness of placebo vs antipsychotics in combination with intensive psychosocial interventions in preventing relapse in the early course of psychosis. Further studies should identify those patients who may not need antipsychotic medication to be able to recover from psychosis.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapySecondary PreventionAntipsychotic AgentsCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansPsychotic DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19900962
PMCPMC3080698
OpenAlexW2154443881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.