Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19900461›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010

F-actin structure destabilization and DNase I binding loop: fluctuations mutational cross-linking and electron microscopy analysis of loop states and effects on F-actin.

Zeynep A Oztug Durer, Karthikeyan Diraviyam, David Sept, Dmitri S Kudryashov, Emil Reisler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural basis of MICAL autoinhibition.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Charge-dependent interactions of monomeric and filamentous actin with lipid bilayers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the actin filament: Subtler than expected.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeynep A Oztug DurerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Karthikeyan Diraviyam
David Sept
Dmitri S Kudryashov
Emil Reisler
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Dynamic Events in Myosin and Actin and Their FunctionR01GM077190 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REISLER, EMIL · 2006 to 2020
$6.2M
Protein interactions underlying actin-based motilityR01GM067246 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SEPT, DAVID S. · 2002 to 2006
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM067246NIGMS NIH HHS GM-077190NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067246NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conformational dynamics of filamentous actin (F-actin) is essential for the regulation and functions of cellular actin networks. The main contribution to F-actin dynamics and its multiple conformational states arises from the mobility and flexibility of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop; residues 40-50) on subdomain 2. Therefore, we explored the structural constraints on D-loop plasticity at the F-actin interprotomer space by probing its dynamic interactions with the hydrophobic loop (H-loop), the C-terminus, and the W-loop via mutational disulfide cross-linking. To this end, residues of the D-loop were mutated to cysteines on yeast actin with a C374A background. These mutants showed no major changes in their polymerization and nucleotide exchange properties compared to wild-type actin. Copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking was investigated in equimolar copolymers of cysteine mutants from the D-loop with either wild-type (C374) actin or mutant S265C/C374A (on the H-loop) or mutant F169C/C374A (on the W-loop). Remarkably, all tested residues of the D-loop could be cross-linked to residues 374, 265, and 169 by disulfide bonds, demonstrating the plasticity of the interprotomer region. However, each cross-link resulted in different effects on the filament structure, as detected by electron microscopy and light-scattering measurements. Disulfide cross-linking in the longitudinal orientation produced mostly no visible changes in filament morphology, whereas the cross-linking of D-loop residues >45 to the H-loop, in the lateral direction, resulted in filament disruption and the presence of amorphous aggregates on electron microscopy images. A similar aggregation was also observed upon cross-linking the residues of the D-loop (>41) to residue 169. The effects of disulfide cross-links on F-actin stability were only partially accounted for by the simulations of current F-actin models. Thus, our results present evidence for the high level of conformational plasticity in the interprotomer space and document the link between D-loop interactions and F-actin stability.

Indexed as

ActinsAmino Acid SubstitutionBase SequenceCross-Linking ReagentsCysteineDeoxyribonuclease IDNA PrimersMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionModels, MolecularMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationProtein StabilityRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsActinsCross-Linking ReagentsCysteineDeoxyribonuclease IDNA PrimersRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19900461
PMCPMC3070609
OpenAlexW1599914853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.