Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19898960›Full record

ArticleCell stress & chaperones2010

Plasma cell differentiation initiates a limited ER stress response by specifically suppressing the PERK-dependent branch of the unfolded protein response.

Yanjun Ma, Yuichiro Shimizu, Melissa J Mann, Yi Jin, Linda M Hendershot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stress & chaperones, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sec22b is a critical and nonredundant regulator of plasma cell maintenance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. In Vitro Stimulation of IRE1α/XBP1-Deficient B Cells with LPS.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanjun MaDepartment of Genetics and Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Yuichiro Shimizu
Melissa J Mann
Yi Jin
Linda M Hendershot
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Role of Molecular Chaperones in Ig Biosynthesis 11-2008R01GM054068 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HENDERSHOT, LINDA M · 1996 to 2018
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIGMS NIH HHS GM54068NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to terminal differentiation signals that enable B cells to produce vast quantities of antibodies, a dramatic expansion of the secretory pathway and a corresponding increase in the molecular chaperones and folding enzymes that aid and monitor immunoglobulin synthesis occurs. Recent studies reveal that the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is normally activated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, plays a critical role in this process. Although B cells activate all three branches of the UPR in response to pharmacological inducers of the pathway, plasma cell differentiation elicits only a partial UPR in which components of the PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) branch are not expressed. This prompted us to further characterize UPR activation during plasma cell differentiation. We found that in response to lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced differentiation of the I.29 micro(+) B cell line, Ire1 was activated early, which led to splicing of XBP-1. PERK was partially phosphorylated with similar kinetics, but this was not sufficient to activate its downstream target eIF-2alpha, which initiates translation arrest, or to induce other targets like CHOP or GADD34. Both of these events preceded increased Ig synthesis, arguing this is not the signal for activating these two transducers. Targets of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) were up-regulated considerably later, arguing that the ATF6 branch is activated by a distinct signal. Pretreatment with LPS inhibited activation of the PERK branch by pharmacological inducers of the UPR, suggesting that differentiation-induced signals specifically silence this branch. This unique ability to differentially regulate various branches of the UPR allows B cells to accomplish distinct outcomes via the same UPR machinery.

Indexed as

Activating Transcription Factor 6AnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDNA-Binding ProteinseIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic ReticulumEnzyme ActivationFemaleLipopolysaccharidesMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNIH 3T3 CellsPlasma CellsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesActivating Transcription Factor 6Atf6 protein, mouseDdit3 protein, mouseDNA-Binding ProteinseIF-2 KinaseErn2 protein, mouseLipopolysaccharidesMembrane ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsTranscription Factor CHOPTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1Xbp1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID19898960
PMCPMC2866998
OpenAlexW2038529477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.