Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19898862›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2010

Gating in CNGA1 channels.

Monica Mazzolini, Arin Marchesi, Alejandro Giorgetti, Vincent Torre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. CNG channel structure, function, and gating: a tale of conformational flexibility.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Insights into the molecular mechanism for hyperpolarization-dependent activation of HCN channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: ion channels.British journal of pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monica MazzoliniCBM S.c.r.l, Area Science Park SS 14 Km 163.5, 34012, Basovizza (TS), Trieste, Italy.
Arin Marchesi
Alejandro Giorgetti
Vincent Torre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aminoacid sequences of CNG and K(+) channels share a significant sequence identity, and it has been suggested that these channels have a common ancestral 3D architecture. However, K(+) and CNG channels have profoundly different physiological properties: indeed, K(+) channels have a high ionic selectivity, their gating strongly depends on membrane voltage and when opened by a steady depolarizing voltage several K(+) channels inactivate, whereas CNG channels have a low ion selectivity, their gating is poorly voltage dependent, and they do not desensitize in the presence of a steady concentration of cyclic nucleotides that cause their opening. The purpose of the present review is to summarize and recapitulate functional and structural differences between K(+) and CNG channels with the aim to understand the gating mechanisms of CNG channels.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationPotassium ChannelsProtein ConformationSequence AlignmentCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsPotassium Channels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.