Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19898741›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

Cell penetrating peptides: overview and applications to the delivery of oligonucleotides.

F Said Hassane, A F Saleh, R Abes, M J Gait, Bernard Lebleu

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cell-Penetrating Peptide Delivery for CRISPR Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Use of Glucose/Fructose to Enhance the Exon Skipping Efficacy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. The Assembly of Fluorescently Labeled Peptide-Oligonucleotide Conjugates.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F Said HassaneUMR 5235 CNRS, Dynamique des Interactions Membranaires Normales et Pathologiques, Université Montpellier 2, 34095, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. fatouma.said-hassane@univ-montp2.fr
A F Saleh
R Abes
M J Gait
Bernard Lebleu

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossing biological barriers represents a major limitation for clinical applications of biomolecules such as nucleic acids, peptides or proteins. Cell penetrating peptides (CPP), also named protein transduction domains, comprise short and usually basic amino acids-rich peptides originating from proteins able to cross biological barriers, such as the viral Tat protein, or are rationally designed. They have emerged as a new class of non-viral vectors allowing the delivery of various biomolecules across biological barriers from low molecular weight drugs to nanosized particles. Encouraging data with CPP-conjugated oligonucleotides have been obtained both in vitro and in vivo in animal models of diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Whether CPP-cargo conjugates enter cells by direct translocation across the plasma membrane or by endocytosis remains controversial. In many instances, however, endosomal escape appears as a major limitation of this new delivery strategy.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsCell Membrane PermeabilityCellsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneOligonucleotidesPeptidesOligonucleotidesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID19898741
PMCPMC11115801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.