ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2010
Five-year results of inguinal hernia treatment with the Prolene Hernia System in a regional training hospital.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLong-term results of inguinal hernia repair with the Prolene Hernia System (PHS) in our regional training hospital were retrospectively analysed. Research was conducted in an identical cohort of patients previously investigated for short-term results.
methodsOne-hundred and fifty-eight patients (217 inguinal hernias) treated with the PHS were traced and included. Patients were invited to visit the outpatient clinic for a brief history, physical examination and ultrasound. A quality of life questionnaire was completed by all patients. The primary endpoint was recurrence rate. Testis atrophy, chronic pain and hypaesthesia were secondary endpoints.
resultsThe mean age of the population (n = 187) was 62.2 years (range 28-92), with a male:female ratio of 15:1 (175:12). The median follow-up was 5.5 years (range 3.9-6.8). One-hundred and forty-five patients visited the outpatient clinic, while 13 patients were included by telephone interview. Twenty-one patients died during follow-up and eight others were lost to follow-up. The resulting follow-up rate was 85% (158/187). In our initial study, we found four recurrences (1.8%) and seven patients with persisting pain (3.2%) after 32 months. During current follow-up, five patients were diagnosed with recurrent herniation (2.3%, 5/217) and only four patients (1.8%) suffered from persisting pain. Three patients (1.4%) were diagnosed with testicular atrophy, while ten patients (4.4%) experienced hypaesthesia.
conclusionIn a regional training hospital, the recurrence rate and long-term complications of patients treated for inguinal hernia with the PHS are acceptable after a follow-up of 5.5 years. The number of patients experiencing persistent pain seems to decrease over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19898738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.