Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19898487›Full record

ArticleNature methods2009

Automated high-throughput mapping of promoter-enhancer interactions in zebrafish embryos.

Jochen Gehrig, Markus Reischl, Eva Kalmár, Marco Ferg, Yavor Hadzhiev, Andreas Zaucker, Chengyi Song, Simone Schindler, Urban Liebel, Ferenc Müller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cis-Regulatory Elements in Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tools to Image Germplasm Dynamics During Early Zebrafish Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jochen GehrigInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Markus Reischl
Eva Kalmár
Marco Ferg
Yavor Hadzhiev
Andreas Zaucker
Chengyi Song
Simone Schindler
Urban Liebel
Ferenc Müller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish embryos offer a unique combination of high-throughput capabilities and the complexity of the vertebrate animal for a variety of phenotypic screening applications. However, there is a need for automation of imaging technologies to exploit the potential of the transparent embryo. Here we report a high-throughput pipeline for registering domain-specific reporter expression in zebrafish embryos with the aim of mapping the interactions between cis-regulatory modules and core promoters. Automated microscopy coupled with custom-built embryo detection and segmentation software allowed the spatial registration of reporter activity for 202 enhancer-promoter combinations, based on images of thousands of embryos. The diversity of promoter-enhancer interaction specificities underscores the importance of the core promoter sequence in cis-regulatory interactions and provides a promoter resource for transgenic reporter studies. The technology described here is also suitable for the spatial analysis of fluorescence readouts in genetic, pharmaceutical or toxicological screens.

Indexed as

AutomationEnhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsTransgenesZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID19898487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.