Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19897857›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2010

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of CDB-2914 in new users of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system shows only short-lived amelioration of unscheduled bleeding.

P Warner, A Guttinger, A F Glasier, R J Lee, S Nickerson, R M Brenner, H O D Critchley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Usual medical treatments or levonorgestrel-IUS for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: long-term randomised pragmatic trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Menstruation: science and society.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Iatrogenic unscheduled (breakthrough) endometrial bleeding.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P WarnerCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
A Guttinger
A F Glasier
R J Lee
S Nickerson
R M Brenner
H O D Critchley
University of Edinburgh · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBNHS Lothian · GB

Funding

Suppression of Breakthrough Bleeding in LNG-IUS UsersR01HD043209 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLAYDEN, OV D · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD43209-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is a highly effective contraceptive. However, during early months of use unscheduled vaginal bleeding is common, sometimes leading to discontinuation. This study aimed to determine whether intermittent administration of progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 would suppress unscheduled bleeding during the first 4 months after insertion of the LNG-IUS.

methodsCDB-2914 150 mg, in divided doses, or placebo tablets, were administered over three consecutive days starting on Days 21, 49 and 77 after LNG-IUS insertion, in a double-blind randomized controlled trial of women aged 19-49 years, newly starting use of LNG-IUS. Daily bleeding diaries were completed for 6 months, and summarized across blocks as percentage days bleeding/spotting (BS%).

resultsOf 69 women randomized to receive CDB-2914, and 67 placebo, 61 and 55, respectively, completed the trial. BS% decreased with time in both arms, but showed a much steeper treatment-phase gradient in the placebo arm (P < 0.0001), so that a benefit of CDB-2914 in the 28 days after first treatment (-11% points, 95% CI -19 to -2), converted to a disadvantage by 64 days after the third treatment (+10% points, 95% CI 1-18).

conclusionsThe effect of CDB-2914 on BS% was initially beneficial but then by third treatment was disadvantageous. Nevertheless, only 3% (4/136) of all women discontinued LNG-IUS. These findings give insight into possible mechanisms and suggest future research directions. ISRCTN Trial no. ISRCTN58283041; EudraCT no. 2006-006511-72.

Indexed as

Intrauterine Devices, MedicatedAdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelMetrorrhagiaMiddle AgedNorpregnadienesReceptors, ProgesteroneContraceptive Agents, FemaleLevonorgestrelNorpregnadienesReceptors, Progesteroneulipristal

Identifiers

PMID19897857
PMCPMC2806180
OpenAlexW2102395114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.