Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19897749›Full record

ArticleGenetics2010

Recurrent selection on the Winters sex-ratio genes in Drosophila simulans.

Sarah B Kingan, Daniel Garrigan, Daniel L Hartl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Signatures of sex ratio distortion in humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The fate of a suppressed X-linked meiotic driver: experimental evolution in Drosophila simulans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Gene drives gaining speed.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020
    Review
  9. Meiotic drive mechanisms: lessons fromProceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sequence and Structural Diversity of Mouse Y Chromosomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Red Queen and King in finite populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. R2d2 Drives Selfish Sweeps in the House Mouse.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah B KinganDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA. skingan@mail.rochester.edu
Daniel Garrigan
Daniel L Hartl

Funding

Evolution of Genome IncompatibilitiesR01GM065169 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L · 2003 to 2011
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM065169NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selfish genes, such as meiotic drive elements, propagate themselves through a population without increasing the fitness of host organisms. X-linked (or Y-linked) meiotic drive elements reduce the transmission of the Y (X) chromosome and skew progeny and population sex ratios, leading to intense conflict among genomic compartments. Drosophila simulans is unusual in having a least three distinct systems of X chromosome meiotic drive. Here, we characterize naturally occurring genetic variation at the Winters sex-ratio driver (Distorter on the X or Dox), its progenitor gene (Mother of Dox or MDox), and its suppressor gene (Not Much Yang or Nmy), which have been previously mapped and characterized. We survey three North American populations as well as 13 globally distributed strains and present molecular polymorphism data at the three loci. We find that all three genes show signatures of selection in North America, judging from levels of polymorphism and skews in the site-frequency spectrum. These signatures likely result from the biased transmission of the driver and selection on the suppressor for the maintenance of equal sex ratios. Coalescent modeling indicates that the timing of selection is more recent than the age of the alleles, suggesting that the driver and suppressor are coevolving under an evolutionary "arms race." None of the Winters sex-ratio genes are fixed in D. simulans, and at all loci we find ancestral alleles, which lack the gene insertions and exhibit high levels of nucleotide polymorphism compared to the derived alleles. In addition, we find several "null" alleles that have mutations on the derived Dox background, which result in loss of drive function. We discuss the possible causes of the maintenance of presence-absence polymorphism in the Winters sex-ratio genes.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticSex RatioAgingAllelesAnimalsCaliforniaDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene ConversionGenes, InsectGenetic LociHaplotypesINDEL MutationLinkage DisequilibriumMaleNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID19897749
PMCPMC2815921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.