Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19897506›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2010

Factors influencing lopinavir and atazanavir plasma concentration.

Wolfgang Stöhr, David Back, David Dunn, Caroline Sabin, Alan Winston, Richard Gilson, Deenan Pillay, Teresa Hill, Jonathan Ainsworth, Brian Gazzard and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in Covid-19 patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang StöhrMRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK. ws@ctu.mrc.ac.uk
David Back
David Dunn
Caroline Sabin
Alan Winston
Richard Gilson
Deenan Pillay
Teresa Hill
Jonathan Ainsworth
Brian Gazzard
Clifford Leen
Loveleen Bansi
Martin Fisher
Chloe Orkin
Jane Anderson
Margaret Johnson
Philippa Easterbrook
Sara Gibbons
Saye Khoo
UK CHIC Steering Committee
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBHomerton University Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKing's College Hospital · GBNHS Lothian · GBNorth Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0000199Medical Research Council G0200585Medical Research Council G0600337Medical Research Council MC_U122886351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe protease inhibitors lopinavir and atazanavir are both recommended for treatment of HIV-infected patients. Considerable inter-individual variability in plasma concentration has been observed for both drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate which demographic factors and concomitant drugs are associated with lopinavir and atazanavir plasma concentration.

methodsData from the Liverpool TDM (therapeutic drug monitoring) Registry were linked with the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) study. For each patient, the first measurement of lopinavir (twice daily) or atazanavir [once daily, ritonavir boosted (/r) or unboosted] plasma concentration was included. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association of dose, gender, age, weight, ethnicity and concomitant antiretroviral drugs or rifabutin with log-transformed drug concentration, adjusted for time since last intake.

resultsData from 439 patients on lopinavir (69% 400 mg/r, 31% 533 mg/r; 3% concomitant rifabutin) and 313 on atazanavir (60% 300 mg/r, 32% 400 mg/r, 8% 400 mg) were included. Multivariable models revealed the following predictors for lopinavir concentration: weight (11% decrease per additional 10 kg; P = 0.001); dose (25% increase for 533 mg/r; P = 0.024); and rifabutin (116% increase; P < 0.001). For atazanavir the predictors were dose (compared with 300 mg/r: 40% increase for 400 mg/r, 67% decrease for 400 mg; overall P < 0.001) and efavirenz (32% decrease; P = 0.016) but not tenofovir (P = 0.54).

conclusionsThis analysis confirms that efavirenz decreases atazanavir concentrations, and there was a negative association of weight and lopinavir concentrations. The strong impact of rifabutin on lopinavir concentration should be studied further.

Indexed as

AdultAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateBenzoxazinesBody WeightCyclopropanesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLopinavirMaleMiddle AgedOligopeptidesPlasmaPyridinesAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzLopinavirOligopeptidesPyridinesPyrimidinonesRifabutin

Identifiers

PMID19897506
PMCPMC2793688
OpenAlexW2154345245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.