Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19895777›Full record

Trial reportJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2009

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in a Polish emergency department: three-month outcomes of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Cheryl J Cherpitel, Jacek Moskalewicz, Grazyna Swiatkiewicz, Yu Ye, Jason Bond

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Alcohol misuse.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex differences in alcohol misuse and estimated blood alcohol concentrations among emergency department patients: implications for brief interventions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheryl J CherpitelAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA 94608-1010, USA. ccherpitel@arg.org
Jacek Moskalewicz
Grazyna Swiatkiewicz
Yu Ye
Jason Bond

Funding

Brief Intervention in the ER in PolandR21AA016081 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI CHERPITEL, CHERYL J · 2007 to 2008
$349k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA016081NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA016081-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA randomized, controlled trial of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for drinking and related problems among at-risk and dependent drinkers was conducted in an emergency department (ED) in Sosnowiec, Poland, among patients ages 18 years and older.

methodData were collected over a 23-week period, from 4:00 PM to midnight, and resulted in 446 patients being recruited into the study (90% of those who screened positive) and randomized to three conditions following a two-stage process: screened only (n = 147), assessed (n = 152), and received intervention (n = 147). Patients in the assessment (85%) and intervention (83%) conditions were blindly reassessed at 3 months via a telephone interview.

resultsAt 3-month follow-up, both groups showed significant decreases in the proportion who were positive for at-risk drinking, the primary outcome variable. Both groups also showed significant decreases in drinking days per week, drinks per drinking day, maximum drinks per occasion, and negative consequences of drinking. Using analysis of covariance to control for baseline measures and demographic characteristics, no difference in outcome measures was found between intervention and assessment conditions. Subgroup analysis found some significant interactions between intervention and secondary outcomes.

conclusionsAlthough the main findings were similar to those from other brief-intervention studies in Western cultures, findings here also suggest that intervention may have differential benefits for specific subgroups of patients in the ED, an area of research that may warrant additional study of brief intervention in the ED setting.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcohol-Related DisordersAnalysis of VarianceData CollectionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningPolandPsychotherapy, BriefReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID19895777
PMCPMC2776128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.