Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19895754›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2009

Control of hypertension in pregnancy.

Laura A Magee, Edgardo Abalos, Peter von Dadelszen, Baha Sibai, Stephen A Walkinshaw, CHIPS Study Group

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Obstetric medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chapter 1: Introduction.Kidney international supplements · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura A MageeBC Women's Hospital and Health Centre and the Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 4500 Oak Street, Room D213, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. LMagee@cw.bc.ca
Edgardo Abalos
Peter von Dadelszen
Baha Sibai
Stephen A Walkinshaw
CHIPS Study Group
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Complications are not limited to preeclampsia but also complicate both preexisting hypertension and isolated gestational hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) management is important but is only one aspect of management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, which may be caused or exacerbated by underlying uteroplacental mismatch between maternal supply and fetal demand. BP treatment thresholds and goals vary in international guidelines, largely reflecting differences in opinion rather than differences in published data. Because of short-term maternal risks, there is consensus that BP should be treated when sustained at greater than or equal to 160 to 170 mm Hg systolic and/or 110 mm Hg diastolic. There is no consensus regarding management of nonsevere hypertension, and randomized controlled trials involving just over 3000 women have not clarified the relative maternal and perinatal risks and benefits. Although antihypertensive therapy may decrease transient severe maternal hypertension, therapy may also impair fetal growth and perinatal health and outcomes. The CHIPS Trial (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) is recruiting to answer this question.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRiskAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID19895754
OpenAlexW2066127469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.