Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19895076›Full record

ArticleThe Review of scientific instruments2009

A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds.

Vijay Shah, Thomas Pohida, Baris Turkbey, Haresh Mani, Maria Merino, Peter A Pinto, Peter Choyke, Marcelino Bernardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Review of scientific instruments, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. 11C-Acetate PET/CT in localized prostate cancer: a study with MRI and histopathologic correlation.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2012
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vijay ShahImaging Physics, SAIC Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 20892, USA.
Thomas Pohida
Baris Turkbey
Haresh Mani
Maria Merino
Peter A Pinto
Peter Choyke
Marcelino Bernardo

Funding

Signal Processing And Instrumentation SectionZIACT000261 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI POHIDA, THOMAS J · 2009 to 2021
$16.7M
Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
Translational Surgical PathologyZIESC000853 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI MERINO, MARIA · 2009 to 2025
$4.3M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method for the design and rapid manufacture of a patient specific tissue slicing device based on in vivo images in order to facilitate the process of correlating the images with histopathology is presented. The method is applied to radical prostatectomy specimens where the customized mold is designed using magnetic resonance (MR) images of each patient obtained prior to surgery. In this case, the mold holds the prostate in place while a knife with a single blade or multiple blades is inserted in slots which are positioned to obtain tissue blocks corresponding to the slices in the MR images. The resulting histological specimens demonstrate good anatomical correlation with the MR images.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer-Aided DesignDogsEquipment DesignHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19895076
PMCPMC2774342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.