Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19894078›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2010

Code status documentation in the outpatient electronic medical records of patients with metastatic cancer.

Jennifer S Temel, Joseph A Greer, Sonal Admane, Jessica Solis, Barbara J Cashavelly, Stephen Doherty, Rebecca Heist, William F Pirl

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02712229 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Primary Palliative Care Intervention (CONNECT) for Patients With Advanced Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,290ConditionsAdvanced CancerArmsCONNECT
NCT05426330 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Cross-sectional, Observational Study of Advanced Cancer Patients' and Their Primary Caregivers' Willingness to Communicate About Advance Care Planning (ACP)

TypeobservationalSponsorJules Bordet InstituteRan2021 to 2024Enrolled600ConditionsAdvanced Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Early and late code status documentation in cancer patients managed by a dedicated supportive care team.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Is the Emergency Department an Inappropriate Venue for Code Status Discussions?The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer S TemelMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7B, Boston, MA 02114, USA. jtemel@partners.org
Joseph A Greer
Sonal Admane
Jessica Solis
Barbara J Cashavelly
Stephen Doherty
Rebecca Heist
William F Pirl
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced care planning (ACP) is considered an essential component of medical care in the United States, especially in patients with incurable diseases. However, little is known about clinical practices in outpatient oncology settings related to discussing end-of-life care and documenting code status preferences in ambulatory medical records.

objectiveTo assess the rate of documentation of code status in the electronic longitudinal medical records (LMR) of patients with metastatic cancer.

designRetrospective review of 2,498 patients with metastatic solid tumors at an academic cancer center. An electronic patient database and the LMR were queried to identify demographic information, cancer type, number of clinic visits, and documentation of code status.

participantsThe sample consisted of adult patients with metastatic prostate, breast, ovarian, bladder kidney, colorectal, non-colorectal gastrointestinal (GI), and lung cancers. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was the percentage of documented code status in the LMR. MAIN

resultsAmong the 2,498 patients, 20.3% had a documented code status. Code status was designated most frequently in patients with non-colorectal GI (193/609, 31.7%) and lung (179/583, 30.7%) cancers and least frequently in patients with genitourinary malignancies [bladder/kidney (4/89, 4.5%), ovarian (4/93, 4.3%), and prostate (7/365, 1.9%) cancers]. Independent predictors of having documented code status included religious affiliation, cancer type, and a greater number of visits to the cancer center. Younger patients and black patients were less likely to be designated as DNR/DNI.

conclusionsDespite the incurable nature of metastatic cancer, only a minority of patients had a code status documented in the electronic medical record.

Indexed as

AdultAdvance Care PlanningAgedAmbulatory CareDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsResuscitation OrdersRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID19894078
PMCPMC2837502
OpenAlexW1968356690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.