Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19893615›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Increasing the number of thyroid lesions classes in microarray analysis improves the relevance of diagnostic markers.

Jean-Fred Fontaine, Delphine Mirebeau-Prunier, Mahatsangy Raharijaona, Brigitte Franc, Stephane Triau, Patrice Rodien, Olivier Goëau-Brissonniére, Lucie Karayan-Tapon, Marielle Mello, Rémi Houlgatte and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Fred FontaineMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Delphine Mirebeau-Prunier
Mahatsangy Raharijaona
Brigitte Franc
Stephane Triau
Patrice Rodien
Olivier Goëau-Brissonniére
Lucie Karayan-Tapon
Marielle Mello
Rémi Houlgatte
Yves Malthiery
Frédérique Savagner
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRHôpital Ambroise-Paré · FRInserm · FRInstitut du Thorax · FRMax Delbrück Center · DENantes Université · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic markers for thyroid cancers identified by microarray analysis have offered limited predictive accuracy so far because of the few classes of thyroid lesions usually taken into account. To improve diagnostic relevance, we have simultaneously analyzed microarray data from six public datasets covering a total of 347 thyroid tissue samples representing 12 histological classes of follicular lesions and normal thyroid tissue. Our own dataset, containing about half the thyroid tissue samples, included all categories of thyroid lesions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsClassifier predictions were strongly affected by similarities between classes and by the number of classes in the training sets. In each dataset, sample prediction was improved by separating the samples into three groups according to class similarities. The cross-validation of differential genes revealed four clusters with functional enrichments. The analysis of six of these genes (APOD, APOE, CLGN, CRABP1, SDHA and TIMP1) in 49 new samples showed consistent gene and protein profiles with the class similarities observed. Focusing on four subclasses of follicular tumor, we explored the diagnostic potential of 12 selected markers (CASP10, CDH16, CLGN, CRABP1, HMGB2, ALPL2, ADAMTS2, CABIN1, ALDH1A3, USP13, NR2F2, KRTHB5) by real-time quantitative RT-PCR on 32 other new samples. The gene expression profiles of follicular tumors were examined with reference to the mutational status of the Pax8-PPARgamma, TSHR, GNAS and NRAS genes. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We show that diagnostic tools defined on the basis of microarray data are more relevant when a large number of samples and tissue classes are used. Taking into account the relationships between the thyroid tumor pathologies, together with the main biological functions and pathways involved, improved the diagnostic accuracy of the samples. Our approach was particularly relevant for the classification of microfollicular adenomas.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisCluster AnalysisDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA PrimersGene Expression ProfilingGenetic MarkersHumansMutationPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX8 Transcription FactorPPAR gammaReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX8 protein, humanPAX8 Transcription FactorPPAR gamma

Identifiers

PMID19893615
PMCPMC2764086
OpenAlexW2046596031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.