ArticlePLoS genetics2009
Functional evolution of cis-regulatory modules at a homeotic gene in Drosophila.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two coacting shadow enhancers regulate twin of eyeless expression during early Drosophila development.Genetics · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Identification and Characterization of HML-9 Group in Chimpanzee Genome.Viruses · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in ThreeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Homeotic Genes: Clustering, Modularity, and Diversity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Molecular Lessons from theGenetics · 2020Review
- A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Rapid and efficient purification of Drosophila homeodomain transcription factors for biophysical characterization.Protein expression and purification · 2019Article
- Drosophila relics hobo and hobo-MITEs transposons as raw material for new regulatory networks.Genetics and molecular biology · 2018Article
- Transposable elements are the primary source of novelty in primate gene regulation.Genome research · 2017Article
- Spatial distribution of predicted transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila ChIP peaks.Mechanisms of development · 2016Article
- Nucleotide Interdependency in Transcription Factor Binding Sites in the Drosophila Genome.Gene regulation and systems biology · 2016Article
- Functionally conserved enhancers with divergent sequences in distant vertebrates.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- The open for business model of the bithorax complex in Drosophila.Chromosoma · 2015Review
- MARZ: an algorithm to combinatorially analyze gapped n-mer models of transcription factor binding.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Quantitative genome-wide enhancer activity maps for five Drosophila species show functional enhancer conservation and turnover during cis-regulatory evolution.Nature genetics · 2014Article
- Pervasive divergence of transcriptional gene regulation in Caenorhabditis nematodes.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
- Deciphering the combinatorial architecture of a Drosophila homeotic gene enhancer.Mechanisms of development · 2014Article
- Flanking sequence context-dependent transcription factor binding in early Drosophila development.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Induced somatic sector analysis of cellulose synthase (CesA) promoter regions in woody stem tissues.Planta · 2013Article
- Tempo and mode in evolution of transcriptional regulation.PLoS genetics · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is a long-held belief in evolutionary biology that the rate of molecular evolution for a given DNA sequence is inversely related to the level of functional constraint. This belief holds true for the protein-coding homeotic (Hox) genes originally discovered in Drosophila melanogaster. Expression of the Hox genes in Drosophila embryos is essential for body patterning and is controlled by an extensive array of cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). How the regulatory modules functionally evolve in different species is not clear. A comparison of the CRMs for the Abdominal-B gene from different Drosophila species reveals relatively low levels of overall sequence conservation. However, embryonic enhancer CRMs from other Drosophila species direct transgenic reporter gene expression in the same spatial and temporal patterns during development as their D. melanogaster orthologs. Bioinformatic analysis reveals the presence of short conserved sequences within defined CRMs, representing gap and pair-rule transcription factor binding sites. One predicted binding site for the gap transcription factor KRUPPEL in the IAB5 CRM was found to be altered in Superabdominal (Sab) mutations. In Sab mutant flies, the third abdominal segment is transformed into a copy of the fifth abdominal segment. A model for KRUPPEL-mediated repression at this binding site is presented. These findings challenge our current understanding of the relationship between sequence evolution at the molecular level and functional activity of a CRM. While the overall sequence conservation at Drosophila CRMs is not distinctive from neighboring genomic regions, functionally critical transcription factor binding sites within embryonic enhancer CRMs are highly conserved. These results have implications for understanding mechanisms of gene expression during embryonic development, enhancer function, and the molecular evolution of eukaryotic regulatory modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.