Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19893611›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Functional evolution of cis-regulatory modules at a homeotic gene in Drosophila.

Margaret C W Ho, Holly Johnsen, Sara E Goetz, Benjamin J Schiller, Esther Bae, Diana A Tran, Andrey S Shur, John M Allen, Christoph Rau, Welcome Bender and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in ThreeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Homeotic Genes: Clustering, Modularity, and Diversity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Margaret C W HoBiology Department, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Holly Johnsen
Sara E Goetz
Benjamin J Schiller
Esther Bae
Diana A Tran
Andrey S Shur
John M Allen
Christoph Rau
Welcome Bender
William W Fisher
Susan E Celniker
Robert A Drewell

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF TWO LOCIR01GM028630 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI BENDER, WELCOME · 1985 to 2017
$3.8M
Promoter-Enhancer Interactions at the Drosophila Bithorax ComplexR03HD054977 · NICHD · HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE · PI DREWELL, ROBERT A · 2007 to 2008
$125k
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 520051213NICHD NIH HHS HD54977NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD054977NIGMS NIH HHS GM28630NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a long-held belief in evolutionary biology that the rate of molecular evolution for a given DNA sequence is inversely related to the level of functional constraint. This belief holds true for the protein-coding homeotic (Hox) genes originally discovered in Drosophila melanogaster. Expression of the Hox genes in Drosophila embryos is essential for body patterning and is controlled by an extensive array of cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). How the regulatory modules functionally evolve in different species is not clear. A comparison of the CRMs for the Abdominal-B gene from different Drosophila species reveals relatively low levels of overall sequence conservation. However, embryonic enhancer CRMs from other Drosophila species direct transgenic reporter gene expression in the same spatial and temporal patterns during development as their D. melanogaster orthologs. Bioinformatic analysis reveals the presence of short conserved sequences within defined CRMs, representing gap and pair-rule transcription factor binding sites. One predicted binding site for the gap transcription factor KRUPPEL in the IAB5 CRM was found to be altered in Superabdominal (Sab) mutations. In Sab mutant flies, the third abdominal segment is transformed into a copy of the fifth abdominal segment. A model for KRUPPEL-mediated repression at this binding site is presented. These findings challenge our current understanding of the relationship between sequence evolution at the molecular level and functional activity of a CRM. While the overall sequence conservation at Drosophila CRMs is not distinctive from neighboring genomic regions, functionally critical transcription factor binding sites within embryonic enhancer CRMs are highly conserved. These results have implications for understanding mechanisms of gene expression during embryonic development, enhancer function, and the molecular evolution of eukaryotic regulatory modules.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsBinding SitesComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianHomeodomain ProteinsMutationPhylogenySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19893611
PMCPMC2763271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.