Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19892196›Full record

ReviewMethods in enzymology2009

Purification of recombinant G-protein-coupled receptors.

Reinhard Grisshammer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in enzymology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A robust antibody discovery platform for difficult-to-express G protein-coupled receptors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Why Taste Is Pharmacology.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Combining Neurobehavioral Analysis andACS chemical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemical science · 2017
    Review
  11. In Situ Reconstitution of the Adenosine AJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reinhard GrisshammerDepartment of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Structure of integral membrane proteinsZIANS003016 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI GRISSHAMMER, REINHARD · 2009 to 2017
$8.5M
Function of integral membrane proteinsZIANS003103 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI GRISSHAMMER, REINHARD · 2009 to 2015
$3.9M
Structure and function of integral membrane proteinsZ01NS003016 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI GRISSHAMMER, REINHARD · 2007 to 2008
$2.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS003016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural and functional analysis of most G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) requires their expression and purification in functional form. The produced amount of recombinant membrane-inserted receptors depends on the optimal combination of a particular GPCR and production host; optimization of expression is still a matter of trial-and-error. Prior to purification, receptors must be extracted from the membranes by use of detergent(s). The choice of an appropriate detergent for solubilization and purification is crucial to maintain receptors in their functional state. The initial enrichment can be carried out by affinity chromatography using a general affinity tag (e.g., poly-histidine tag). If the first purification step does not yield pure receptor protein, purification to homogeneity can often be achieved by use of a subsequent receptor-specific ligand column. If suitable immobilized ligands are not available, size exclusion chromatography or other techniques need to be applied. Many GPCRs become unstable upon detergent extraction from lipid membranes, and measures for stabilization are discussed. As an example, the purification of a functional neurotensin receptor to homogeneity in milligram quantities is given below.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, AffinityHumansReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, NeurotensinRecombinant ProteinsSolubilityneurotensin type 1 receptorReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, NeurotensinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19892196
PMCPMC4754789
OpenAlexW195012203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.