Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19892001›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2010

Effects of neurokinin-1 receptor agonism and antagonism in the rostral ventromedial medulla of rats with acute or persistent inflammatory nociception.

M V Hamity, S R White, D L Hammond

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shifting the Balance: How Top-Down and Bottom-Up Input Modulate PainFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M V HamityDepartment of Anesthesia, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive 6 JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
S R White
D L Hammond
University of Iowa · US

Funding

OPIOID MECHANISMS OF ANALGESIAR01DA006736 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HAMMOND, DONNA L · 1991 to 2013
$3.7M
Role of Medullary Substance P in Acute and Persistent NociceptionR01DA023576 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HAMMOND, DONNA L · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA006736NIDA NIH HHS R01DA006736NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023576NIDA NIH HHS R01DA023576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), a central relay in the bulbospinal pathways that modulate nociception, contains high concentrations of substance P (Sub P) and neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptors. However, the function of Sub P in the RVM is poorly understood. This study characterized the actions of Sub P in the RVM in the absence of injury and then used two NK1 receptor antagonists, L-733,060 and L-703, 606, to probe the role of endogenously released Sub P in the development and maintenance of persistent inflammatory nociception of immune or neurogenic origin. In uninjured rats, microinjection of Sub P in the RVM produced a transient thermal antinociception that was attenuated by pretreatment with L-733,060 or L-703,606. It did not alter threshold to withdrawal from tactile stimulation with von Frey filaments. Microinjection of the antagonists alone did not alter paw withdrawal latency (PWL) or threshold suggesting that Sub P is not tonically released in the RVM in the absence of injury. However, microinjection of either antagonist in the RVM was sufficient to reverse heat hyperalgesia 4 h, 4 days or 2 weeks after intraplantar (ipl) injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Antagonism of NK1 receptors in the RVM did not prevent or reverse tactile hypersensitivity induced by CFA, but did attenuate that produced by capsaicin. NK1 receptor antagonism did not prevent the development of thermal hyperalgesia, tactile hypersensitivity or spontaneous pain behaviors induced by mustard oil (MO). The results suggest that Sub P has bimodal actions in the RVM and that following inflammatory injury, it can play a critical role as a pronociceptive agent in the development and maintenance of hyperalgesia and tactile hypersensitivity. However, its actions are highly dependent on the stimulus modality and the type of injury, and this may be an additional basis for the poor efficacy of NK1 receptor antagonists in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Neurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsCapsaicinCentral Nervous System AgentsFreund's AdjuvantHot TemperatureMaleMedulla OblongataMustard PlantPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPhysical StimulationPiperidinesPlant OilsQuinuclidines3-((3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyloxy)-2-phenylpiperidineCapsaicinCentral Nervous System AgentsFreund's AdjuvantL 703606mustard oilNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsPiperidinesPlant OilsQuinuclidinesReceptors, Neurokinin-1Substance P

Identifiers

PMID19892001
PMCPMC2815160
OpenAlexW2090771267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.