Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2009
On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 245 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Alirocumab on Saphenous Vein Graft Atherosclerosis: The Alirocumab for Stopping Atherosclerosis Progression in Saphenous Vein Grafts (ASAP-SVG) Pilot Trial
CSP #517 - Outcomes Following Myocardial Revascularization: On and Off Cardiopulmonary Bypass
ON Pump vs OFF Pump Myocardial Revascularization in High Risk Patients: a Randomized Study
Who cites it
245 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conventional hybrid coronary vs. robot-assisted minimally invasive direct revascularization: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Female Sex on Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Representation of Women in Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of Age on Clinical Outcomes Following On-/Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2020Pooled it
- The patency of graft and anastomoses in sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.Seminars in nephrology · 2020Pooled it
- Use of cardiopulmonary pump support during coronary artery bypass grafting in the high-risk: a meta-analysis.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Pooled it
- Does off-pump coronary revascularization confer superior organ protection in re-operative coronary artery surgery? A meta-analysis of observational studies.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2014Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of large randomized trials for mid-term major cardio- and cerebrovascular events following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2014Pooled it
- Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Intimal hyperplasia, saphenous vein graft disease, and clinical outcomes: Insights from the CTSN VEST randomized trial.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Trial
- Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Trial
- Efficacy of early goal-directed therapy using FloTrac/EV1000 to improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Trial
- Impact of early quantitative morbidity on 1-year outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Trial
- Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study.BMC anesthesiology · 2019Trial
- On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients older than 60 years: five-year follow-up of MASS III trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2014Trial
- Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial.Clinical cardiology · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Less invasive coronary artery revascularization with a minimized extracorporeal circulation system: preliminary results of a comparative study with off-pump-procedures.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2013Trial
- Bleeding-associated outcomes with preoperative clopidogrel use in on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2012Trial
185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has traditionally been performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG). CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) might reduce the number of complications related to the heart-lung machine.
methodsWe randomly assigned 2203 patients scheduled for urgent or elective CABG to either on-pump or off-pump procedures. The primary short-term end point was a composite of death or complications (reoperation, new mechanical support, cardiac arrest, coma, stroke, or renal failure) before discharge or within 30 days after surgery. The primary long-term end point was a composite of death from any cause, a repeat revascularization procedure, or a nonfatal myocardial infarction within 1 year after surgery. Secondary end points included the completeness of revascularization, graft patency at 1 year, neuropsychological outcomes, and the use of major resources.
resultsThere was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG in the rate of the 30-day composite outcome (7.0% and 5.6%, respectively; P=0.19). The rate of the 1-year composite outcome was higher for off-pump than for on-pump CABG (9.9% vs. 7.4%, P=0.04). The proportion of patients with fewer grafts completed than originally planned was higher with off-pump CABG than with on-pump CABG (17.8% vs. 11.1%, P<0.001). Follow-up angiograms in 1371 patients who underwent 4093 grafts revealed that the overall rate of graft patency was lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (82.6% vs. 87.8%, P<0.01). There were no treatment-based differences in neuropsychological outcomes or short-term use of major resources.
conclusionsAt 1 year of follow-up, patients in the off-pump group had worse composite outcomes and poorer graft patency than did patients in the on-pump group. No significant differences between the techniques were found in neuropsychological outcomes or use of major resources. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032630.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
19890125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.