Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19889575›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of medical microbiology : IJMM2010

Interaction of staphylococci with bone.

John A Wright, Sean P Nair

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The endothelium at the interface between tissues andClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  10. Implant-DerivedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI).The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025
    Review
  12. Bacterial and host interactions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review on skeletal disorders caused byThe veterinary quarterly · 2022
    Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John A WrightDivision of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK.
Sean P Nair
Eastman Dental Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococci, in particular Staphylococcus aureus, are the predominant cause of bone infections worldwide. These infections are painful, debilitating and with the rise in antibiotic-resistant forms, increasingly difficult to treat. The growth in the number of prosthetic joint replacement procedures also provides new opportunities for these infections to take hold. Comprehending the mechanisms by which staphylococci interact with and damage bone is critical to the development of new approaches to meet this challenge. This review summarises current understanding of the mechanisms by which staphylococci infect and damage bone. We address the role of the inflammatory response to staphylococcal infection in disrupting the homeostatic balance of bone matrix deposition and resorption and thereby mediating bone destruction. A number of virulence factors that have been shown to contribute to bone infection and pathology are discussed, however no single factor has been defined as being specific to bone infections. Although traditionally considered an extracellular pathogen, there is increasing evidence that staphylococci are able to invade host cells, and that an intracellular lifestyle may facilitate long-term persistence in bone tissue, enabling evasion of antimicrobials and host immune responses. 'Small colony variant' strains, with mutations disabling the electron transport pathway appear particularly adept at invading and persisting within host cells, and exhibit enhanced antimicrobial resistance, and may represent a further complication in the treatment and management of staphylococcal bone disease.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsBone and BonesBone RemodelingHumansInflammationOsteomyelitisStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusVirulence

Identifiers

PMID19889575
PMCPMC2814006
OpenAlexW1982366582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.