ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2010
Validating the children's medicines use questionnaire (CMUQ) in Australia.
Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Out-of-Hospital Administration of Medication without Prescription and Associated Factors among Preschool Children.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Association between parental attitudes and self-medication of their children.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2013Article
- Simulated caregivers: their feasibility in educating pharmacy staff to manage children's ailments.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2012Article
- Reliability of self-reported health risk factors and chronic conditions questions collected using the telephone in South Australia, Australia.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Article
- Information sources used by parents buying non-prescription medicines in pharmacies for preschool children.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo pilot test the validity and reliability of the English version of the Children's Medicines Questionnaire (CMUQ) and to explore the attitudes of Australian caregivers towards the use of medicines in children.
settingSurvey of Australian parents and primary care givers of children 0-15 years.
methodsThe questionnaire was translated from Finnish to English then back-translated to ensure semantic equivalence. A total of 153 parents/main caregiver of a child aged 0-15 years were recruited via convenience sampling. Construct validity of the attitudinal section of the CMUQ was performed using exploratory factor analysis. Reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient as a marker of internal consistency. Three focus groups were conducted to explore participants' attitudes towards medicating children and to triangulate quantitative data.
main outcome measureConstruct validity and internal reliability of the CMUQ.
resultsFactor analysis generated a parsimonious four factor solution explaining 50% of variance in the data. The four subscales representing the four factor solution each returned a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient >0.6, indicating good internal consistency. Participants in focus groups were satisfied with the structure and content of the questionnaire. There were 5 emergent themes through focus group discussions with parents and primary care givers of children, regarding the perception of medicines use in children. These included, 'concerns about the negative effects of medicines', 'medicines are useful, necessary and safe in treating illnesses in children', 'the body's natural processes are sufficient in fighting illness', 'over the counter medicines are effective and useful in treating illness', 'perception of alternative medicines use in children'.
conclusionsThe CMUQ is a valid and reliable tool to measure parents' medicine use for their children in an Australian sample. Although small modifications should be made, this instrument will be valuable in informing the development of medicines information for this cohort in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.