ArticleMicrobial ecology2010
Microbial diversity in uranium mining-impacted soils as revealed by high-density 16S microarray and clone library.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of uranium pollution on the Arachis Hypogaea rhizosphere microbial community.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Bacterial Diversity Dynamics in Sandy Loam Soils in Tanzania Under Varying Fertilizer-Derived Uranium Concentrations.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Exploring functional microbiota for uranium sequestration in Zoige uranium mine soil.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Taxonomic Diversity and Functional Traits of Soil Bacterial Communities under Radioactive Contamination: A Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Potential applications of microbial genomics in nuclear non-proliferation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Effects of coal-derived compound fertilizers on soil bacterial community structure in coal mining subsidence areas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Employing gene chip technology for monitoring and assessing soil heavy metal pollution.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Review
- Effects of Seven-Year Fertilization Reclamation on Bacterial Community in a Coal Mining Subsidence Area in Shanxi, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Microbial interaction with and tolerance of radionuclides: underlying mechanisms and biotechnological applications.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Review
- Long-term Impact of Gold and Platinum on Microbial Diversity in Australian Soils.Microbial ecology · 2021Article
- Comparative metatranscriptome analysis revealed broad response of microbial communities in two soil types, agriculture versus organic soil.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2019Article
- Chemical mixtures and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of natural microbial community in the Tiber river.The Science of the total environment · 2019Article
- Comparative metagenomics study reveals pollution induced changes of microbial genes in mangrove sediments.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Characterization of iron-metabolizing communities in soils contaminated by acid mine drainage from an abandoned coal mine in Southwest China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Speciation Distribution of Heavy Metals in Uranium Mining Impacted Soils and Impact on Bacterial Community Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Analysis of microbial communities in heavy metals-contaminated soils using the metagenomic approach.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Comparative assessment of autochthonous bacterial and fungal communities and microbial biomarkers of polluted agricultural soils of the Terra dei Fuochi.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The Golden Activity of Lysinibacillus sphaericus: New Insights on Gold Accumulation and Possible Nanoparticles Biosynthesis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Bacterial community structure and diversity responses to the direct revegetation of an artisanal zinc smelting slag after 5 years.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Core Sulphate-Reducing Microorganisms in Metal-Removing Semi-Passive Biochemical Reactors and the Co-Occurrence of Methanogens.Microorganisms · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial diversity was characterized in mining-impacted soils collected from two abandoned uranium mine sites, the Edgemont and the North Cave Hills, South Dakota, using a high-density 16S microarray (PhyloChip) and clone libraries. Characterization of the elemental compositions of soils by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy revealed higher metal contamination including uranium at the Edgemont than at the North Cave Hills mine site. Microarray data demonstrated extensive phylogenetic diversity in soils and confirmed nearly all clone-detected taxonomic levels. Additionally, the microarray exhibited greater diversity than clone libraries at each taxonomic level at both the mine sites. Interestingly, the PhyloChip detected the largest number of taxa in Proteobacteria phylum for both the mine sites. However, clone libraries detected Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes as the most numerically abundant phyla in the Edgemont and North Cave Hills mine sites, respectively. Several 16S rDNA signatures found in both the microarrays and clone libraries displayed sequence similarities with yet-uncultured bacteria representing a hitherto unidentified diversity. Results from this study demonstrated that highly diverse microbial populations were present in these uranium mine sites. Diversity indices indicated that microbial communities at the North Cave Hills mine site were much more diverse than those at the Edgemont mine site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19888627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.