ArticlePloS one2009
Targeted KRAS mutation assessment on patient tumor histologic material in real time diagnostics.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03951233 (Genotyping K-RAS and EGFR in Greek Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genotyping K-RAS and EGFR in Greek Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: Incidence, Significance and Treatment Implications
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase II study of panitumumab combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical results including extended tumor genotyping.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2018Trial
- Evaluation of two highly-multiplexed custom panels for massively parallel semiconductor sequencing on paraffin DNA.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Trial
- GenotypingCancer genomics & proteomicsTrial
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tumor microenvironment and problems in the development of novel therapeutic strategies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Genotyping data of routinely processed matched primary/metastatic tumor samples.Data in brief · 2021Article
- GLI1: A Therapeutic Target for Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Neoplastic cell percentage estimation in tissue samples for molecular oncology: recommendations from a modified Delphi study.Histopathology · 2019Article
- Genotyping and mRNA profiling reveal actionable molecular targets in biliary tract cancers.American journal of cancer research · 2018Article
- Accurate Detection of Hepatitis B Virus G1896A Mutant by Developed Taqman-ARMS Followed a Strict Control System.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2016Article
- Article
- Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2016Article
- KRAS G12D Mutation Subtype Is A Prognostic Factor for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF by mass spectrometry - a sensitive, reliable, fast and cost-effective technique.Diagnostic pathology · 2015Article
- High-throughput RNAi screening of human kinases identifies predictors of clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin.Oncotarget · 2015Article
- PIK3C2G copy number is associated with clinical outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- CT versus FDG-PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.Cancer medicine · 2014Article
- Article
- Tumor cellularity as a quality assurance measure for accurate clinical detection of BRAF mutations in melanoma.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTesting for tumor specific mutations on routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues may predict response to treatment in Medical Oncology and has already entered diagnostics, with KRAS mutation assessment as a paradigm. The highly sensitive real time PCR (Q-PCR) methods developed for this purpose are usually standardized under optimal template conditions. In routine diagnostics, however, suboptimal templates pose the challenge. Herein, we addressed the applicability of sequencing and two Q-PCR methods on prospectively assessed diagnostic cases for KRAS mutations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsTumor FFPE-DNA from 135 diagnostic and 75 low-quality control samples was obtained upon macrodissection, tested for fragmentation and assessed for KRAS mutations with dideoxy-sequencing and with two Q-PCR methods (Taqman-minor-groove-binder [TMGB] probes and DxS-KRAS-IVD). Samples with relatively well preserved DNA could be accurately analyzed with sequencing, while Q-PCR methods yielded informative results even in cases with very fragmented DNA (p<0.0001) with 100% sensitivity and specificity vs each other. However, Q-PCR efficiency (Ct values) also depended on DNA-fragmentation (p<0.0001). Q-PCR methods were sensitive to detect<or=1% mutant cells, provided that samples yielded cycle thresholds (Ct)<29, but this condition was met in only 38.5% of diagnostic samples. In comparison, FFPE samples (>99%) could accurately be analyzed at a sensitivity level of 10% (external validation of TMGB results). DNA quality and tumor cell content were the main reasons for discrepant sequencing/Q-PCR results (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Diagnostic targeted mutation assessment on FFPE-DNA is very efficient with Q-PCR methods in comparison to dideoxy-sequencing. However, DNA fragmentation/amplification capacity and tumor DNA content must be considered for the interpretation of Q-PCR results in order to provide accurate information for clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.