ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2009
Sequential comparison of tiotropium to high-dose ipratropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a practice setting.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods to assess COPD medications adherence in healthcare databases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol or tiotropium in subjects with COPD at cardiovascular risk.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the effect of changing anticholinergic therapy in patients with COPD from ipratropium to tiotropium on pulmonary function.
methodsWe examined records of patients prescribed high-dose ipratropium, who were subsequently converted to tiotropium. Spirometric values were obtained within 2 days of the change in medication and after 56 to 224 days of the switch to tiotropium.
results15 subjects were documented to have filled a prescription for ipratropium-containing medications the month prior to the change. Medication compliance over the 6 months prior to the switch in these patients was 72% +/- 31% (mean +/- SD) for ipratropium compared to 87% +/- 14% for tiotropium over the 6-month period after the switch (P = 0.1). FEV(1) improved from 1.12 +/- 0.39 L at baseline to 1.37 +/- 0.49 L after the change to tiotropium (P = 0.01). FVC also improved from 2.45 +/- 0.73 L at baseline to 2.72 +/- 0.69 L after the change (P = 0.04). Maximal voluntary ventilation was also increased from 39.67 +/- 10.7 L/min to 45.13 +/- 15.8 L/min (P = 0.045).
conclusionsWe conclude that replacing high-dose ipratropium with tiotropium therapy significantly improves pulmonary function in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.