Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19885673›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2010

Quantifying the mechanical work of resting quadriceps muscle tone.

William Paul McKay, Philip D Chilibeck, Brian L F Daku, Brendan Lett

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Validating subject-specific knee models fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William Paul McKayDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Saskatchewan, RUH 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada. wim925@mail.usask.ca
Philip D Chilibeck
Brian L F Daku
Brendan Lett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our laboratory has shown that resting muscle, commonly thought to be mechanically inert, is actually mechanically active. We report a study of the mechanics of resting quadriceps muscle in adult surgical patients that determines how much metabolic activity can be attributed to quadriceps resting-muscle mechanical work. This was calculated by studying the motion of relaxed supine subjects' instrumented legs dropped onto a pillow before and after anesthesia with muscle paralysis. By subtracting the acceleration of the dropping leg of the conscious subject before the quadriceps is paralysed from that found after paralysis, resting muscle tensile force and power of the quadriceps muscles can be calculated. Mechanomyography was also recorded, using an accelerometer. Paralysis produced an increase in acceleration in all cases (pre-paralysis 6.99 +/- 1.51 m s(-2); post-paralysis 7.65 +/- 1.51 m s(-2); P = 0.00007) and a decrease in mechanomyographic mean absolute amplitude (pre-paralysis 10.6 +/- 3.7 mm s(-2); post-paralysis 4.5 +/- 2.6 mm s(-2); P = 0.00003). Calculated force exerted by resting quadriceps was 22.6 +/- 16.8 N; power 0.34 +/- 0.17 W, corresponding to a daily caloric expenditure of 7.0 +/- 3.6 kcal day(-1). This corresponds to approximately 205 kcal day(-1) for all skeletal muscle. Knowledge of the phenomenon of resting muscle mechanical activity may be of clinically importance in the study and treatment of obesity and of disorders of muscle tone.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaExerciseFemaleHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle StrengthMuscle TonusMyography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.