Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19883580›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Transport theory for HIV diffusion through in vivo distributions of topical microbicide gels.

Bonnie E Lai, Marcus H Henderson, Jennifer J Peters, David K Walmer, David F Katz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Drug and therapeutic intravaginal delivery targeting diseases in the female reproductive tract: A mathematical modeling perspective.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bonnie E LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Marcus H Henderson
Jennifer J Peters
David K Walmer
David F Katz
Duke University · US

Funding

Preclinical User Accptability Studies Long Acting Vaginal Gels, Intravaginal RingU19AI077289 · NIAID · IMQUEST BIOSCIENCES · PI BUCKHEIT, ROBERT WALTER · 2008 to 2012
$6.7M
Biophysics of Microbicides for STD PreventionR01AI048103 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DAVID FRANK · 2001 to 2005
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048103NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI48103NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI077289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical microbicide products are being developed for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. These include vaginally-applied gels that deliver anti-HIV molecules. Gels may also provide partial barriers that slow virion diffusion from semen to vulnerable epithelium, increasing the time during which anti-HIV molecules can act. To explore the barrier function of microbicide gels, we developed a deterministic mathematical model for HIV diffusion through realistic gel distributions. We applied the model to experimental data for in vivo coating distributions of two vaginal gels in women. Time required for a threshold number of virions to reach the tissue surface was used as a metric for comparing different scenarios. Results delineated how time to threshold increased with increasing gel layer thickness and with decreasing diffusion coefficient. We note that for gel layers with average thickness > approximately 100 microm, the fractional area coated, rather than the gel layer thickness, was the primary determinant of time to threshold. For gel layers < approximately 100 microm, time to threshold was brief, regardless of fractional area coated. Application of the model to vaginal coating data showed little difference in time to threshold between the two gels tested. However, the protocol after gel application (i.e., with or without simulated coitus) had a much more significant effect. This study suggests that gel distribution in layers of thickness >100 microm and fractional area coated >0.8 is critical in determining the ability of the gel to serve as a barrier to HIV diffusion.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiophysicsDiffusionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansModels, AnatomicModels, TheoreticalSemenVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID19883580
PMCPMC2770622
OpenAlexW2042451585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.