Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19882379›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2010

Cancer screening practices among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors: results from the 2001 and 2003 California health interview survey.

Erica S Breslau, Diana D Jeffery, William W Davis, Richard P Moser, Timothy S McNeel, Sarah Hawley

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2013
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multilevel determinants of financial toxicity in breast cancer care: perspectives of healthcare professionals and Latina survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An analysis of the association between cancer-related information seeking and adherence to breast cancer surveillance procedures.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Erica S BreslauBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. breslaue@mail.nih.gov
Diana D Jeffery
William W Davis
Richard P Moser
Timothy S McNeel
Sarah Hawley
Information Management Services · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Coalition for Cancer Survivorship · USOffice of the Director · USStatistical Research (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen treated for breast cancer are at increased risk for developing second or new cancers. This study examined behavioral and health care utilization practices associated with screening behaviors for mammography, Papanicolaou (Pap), home fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, proctoscopy) among racially and ethnically diverse female breast cancer survivors (BCS) and women without a cancer history.

methodsData from the 2001 and 2003 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), a random-digit dial population-based survey of adult respondents was used to examine self-reported screening practices of BCS (n = 1,502) and women without a cancer history (n = 31,911).

resultsCompared to women without a cancer history, BCS reported more recent screening for all tests. Among BCS, Hispanics reported lowest screening for routine mammography (84.2% versus 68.9%; P < 0.05) but highest screening for Pap test (95.4% versus 85.4%; P > 0.01). White and Asian BCS reported more endoscopic examinations (58.9% versus 46.5%; P < 0.001; 61.2% versus 38.4%; P < 0.05) than the comparison population. After adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, and health status differences, screening rates for BCS showed higher mammography use (odds ratio [OR] 1.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.58-2.46), Pap test (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.22-1.70), and endoscopic use (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.16-1.58), but not higher for FOBT.

conclusionsEven though BCS generally had higher cancer screening rates than women without a cancer history, racial/ethnic differences exist among the type of test received. Narrowing these differences is essential to lessen disparities. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The need for screening guidelines for BCS remains a high priority. Survivors would benefit from the frequency of screening for all cancers post-treatment.

Indexed as

SurvivorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaColonoscopyCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth ServicesHealth SurveysHumansMammographyMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID19882379
OpenAlexW2034811830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.