Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19882361›Full record

SynthesisMolecular biology reports2010

TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls.

Ru-Yan Liao, Chen Mao, Li-Xin Qiu, Hong Ding, Qing Chen, Hai-Feng Pan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. TGF-β signaling pathway and breast cancer susceptibility.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2011
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Transforming growth factor-β in tumour development.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Association ofCancers · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. TGFBR1 and cancer susceptibility.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ru-Yan LiaoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Chen Mao
Li-Xin Qiu
Hong Ding
Qing Chen
Hai-Feng Pan
Southern Medical University · CNAnhui Medical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published data on the association between TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 32 studies including 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risks were associated with TGFBR1*6A in all genetic models (for allelic effect: OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03-1.21; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.01-1.69; for 9A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01-1.15; for dominant model: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02-1.15; for recessive model: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00-1.68). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in breast cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01-1.34) and ovarian cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.00-1.54; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.03-5.33). However, no significant associations were found in colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer for all genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility, increasing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsOdds RatioPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPublication BiasReceptors, Transforming Growth Factor betaReceptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type IProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReceptors, Transforming Growth Factor betaReceptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type ITGFBR1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19882361
OpenAlexW2079774957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.