ReviewInternational journal of public health2009
Are there health benefits associated with comprehensive smoke-free laws.
Review in International journal of public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Evaluation of Iranian Version of Beliefs about Third-Hand Smoke Scale (BATHS-T) in Pregnant Women.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- State Preemption Repeal: A Pathway to Broader Smoke-Free Indoor Air Policies in the U.S.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- The Irish Smoking Ban Legislation, Astride the Celtic Tiger, Trail-Blazed a Can-Do Tobacco Control Culture.Tobacco use insights · 2024Article
- Impact of comprehensive smoke-free policy compliance on SHS exposure and health condition of the Georgian population.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2021Article
- Student Attitudes Toward Tobacco Use and Tobacco Policies on College Campuses.Journal of community health · 2020Article
- Do age, period or cohort effects explain circulatory disease mortality trends, Scotland 1974-2015?Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2020Article
- Article
- Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: a global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group.Tobacco control · 2019Review
- Development of a scale assessing Beliefs About ThirdHand Smoke (BATHS).Tobacco induced diseases · 2017Article
- A cross sectional evaluation of a total smoking ban at a large Australian university.BMC research notes · 2016Article
- National and state prevalence of smoke-free rules in homes with and without children and smokers: Two decades of progress.Preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Exposure to secondhand smoke and attitudes toward smoke-free workplaces among employed U.S. adults: findings from the National Adult Tobacco Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014Article
- The effect of workplace smoking bans on heart rate variability and pulse wave velocity of non-smoking hospitality workers.International journal of public health · 2014Article
- The support for smoke free policy and how it is influenced by tolerance to smoking - experience of a developing country.PloS one · 2014Article
- "Moving forward: a cross sectional baseline study of staff and student attitudes towards a totally smoke free university campus".BMC public health · 2013Article
- A cross-country comparison of secondhand smoke exposure among adults: findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS).Tobacco control · 2013Article
- Smoke-free rules and secondhand smoke exposure in homes and vehicles among US adults, 2009-2010.Preventing chronic disease · 2013Article
- Evaluation of the smoking ban in public places in France one year and five years after its implementation: Findings from the ITC France survey.Bulletin epidemiologique hebdomadaire (Paris, France) · 2013Article
- Article
- Effect of smoke-free legislation on Ticino gastronomy revenue.International journal of public health · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the past few years, comprehensive smoke-free laws that prohibit smoking in all workplaces have been introduced in many jurisdictions in the US, Canada, and Europe. In this paper, we review published studies to ascertain if there is any evidence of health benefits resulting from the implementation of these laws.
methodsAll papers relating to smoke-free legislation published in or after 2004 were considered for inclusion in this review. We used Pubmed, Google scholar, and Web of Science as the main search tools. The primary focus of the paper is on health outcomes, and thus many papers that only report exposure data are not included.
resultsStudies using subjective measures of respiratory health based on questionnaire data alone consistently reported that workers experience fewer respiratory and irritant symptoms following the introduction of smoke-free laws. Some studies also found measured improvements in the lung function of workers. However, the most dramatic health outcome associated with smoke-free laws has been the reduction in myocardial infarction in the general population. This outcome has been observed in the US, Canada, and Europe, with studies reporting reductions of between 6 and 40%, post-legislation, the larger reductions being mostly from studies with smaller population groups. The evidence as to whether these smoke-free laws have helped smokers to stop smoking or to reduce tobacco consumption is less clear.
conclusionsThere is now significant body of published literature that demonstrates that smoke-free laws can lead to improvements in the health of both workers who are occupationally exposed and of the general population. There is no longer any reason why non-smokers should be exposed to SHS in any workplace. We recommend that all countries adopt national smoke-free laws that are in line with article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control that sets out recommendations for the development, implementation, and enforcement of national, comprehensive smoke-free laws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19882106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.