Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19881958›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2009

Naphthalimides induce G(2) arrest through the ATM-activated Chk2-executed pathway in HCT116 cells.

Hong Zhu, Ze-Hong Miao, Min Huang, Jian-Ming Feng, Zhi-Xiang Zhang, Jin-Jian Lu, Yu-Jun Cai, Lin-Jiang Tong, Yu-Fang Xu, Xu-Hong Qian and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The interconnectedness of cancer cell signaling.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The War on Cancer rages on.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong ZhuDivision of Anti-tumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, PR China.
Ze-Hong Miao
Min Huang
Jian-Ming Feng
Zhi-Xiang Zhang
Jin-Jian Lu
Yu-Jun Cai
Lin-Jiang Tong
Yu-Fang Xu
Xu-Hong Qian
Jian Ding
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Institute of Materia Medica · CNEast China University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naphthalimides, particularly amonafide and 2-(2-dimethylamino)-6-thia-2-aza-benzo[def]chrysene-1,3-diones (R16), have been identified to possess anticancer activities and to induce G(2)-M arrest through inhibiting topoisomerase II accompanied by Chk1 degradation. The current study was designed to precisely dissect the signaling pathway(s) responsible for the naphthalimide-induced cell cycle arrest in human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells. Using phosphorylated histone H3 and mitotic protein monoclonal 2 as mitosis markers, we first specified the G(2) arrest elicited by the R16 and amonafide. Then, R16 and amonafide were revealed to induce phosphorylation of the DNA damage sensor ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) responding to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Inhibition of ATM by both the pharmacological inhibitor caffeine and the specific small interference RNA (siRNA) rescued the G(2) arrest elicited by R16, indicating its ATM-dependent characteristic. Furthermore, depletion of Chk2, but not Chk1 with their corresponding siRNA, statistically significantly reversed the R16- and amonafide-triggered G(2) arrest. Moreover, the naphthalimides phosphorylated Chk2 in an ATM-dependent manner but induced Chk1 degradation. These data indicate that R16 and amonafide preferentially used Chk2 as evidenced by the differential ATM-executed phosphorylation of Chk1 and Chk2. Thus, a clear signaling pathway can be established, in which ATM relays the DNA DSBs signaling triggered by the naphthalimides to the checkpoint kinases, predominantly to Chk2,which finally elicits G(2) arrest. The mechanistic elucidation not only favors the development of the naphthalimides as anticancer agents but also provides an alternative strategy of Chk2 inhibition to potentiate the anticancer activities of these agents.

Indexed as

AdenineAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBlotting, WesternCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueG2 PhaseHCT116 CellsHumansNaphthalimidesOrganophosphonatesProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases2-(2-dimethylamino)-6-thia-2-azabenzo(def)chrysene-1,3-dioneAdenineamonafideAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsNaphthalimidesOrganophosphonatesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, Small InterferingThiophenesTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19881958
PMCPMC2767224
OpenAlexW1566199112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.