Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19881522›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2009

Bacterial responses to photo-oxidative stress.

Eva C Ziegelhoffer, Timothy J Donohue

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. UsingACS ES&T engineering · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Illuminating the dark majority: photobiology of nonphotosynthetic bacteria.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Microbial ecology of the atmosphere.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva C ZiegelhofferDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Timothy J Donohue
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Bacterial Response to Singlet OxygenR01GM075273 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DONOHUE, TIMOTHY J · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM075273NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singlet oxygen is one of several reactive oxygen species that can destroy biomolecules, microorganisms and other cells. Traditionally, the response to singlet oxygen has been termed photo-oxidative stress, as light-dependent processes in photosynthetic cells are major biological sources of singlet oxygen. Recent work identifying a core set of singlet oxygen stress response genes across various bacterial species highlights the importance of this response for survival by both photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic cells. Here, we review how bacterial cells mount a transcriptional response to photo-oxidative stress in the context of what is known about bacterial stress responses to other reactive oxygen species.

Indexed as

LightAntioxidantsBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA DamageGene Expression RegulationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOxidative StressOxygenPhotochemistryPhotosynthesisReactive Oxygen SpeciesRNA, BacterialAntioxidantsDNA, BacterialOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19881522
PMCPMC2793278
OpenAlexW2081643683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.