Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19880653›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

In vivo bioluminescence imaging for the study of intestinal colonization by Escherichia coli in mice.

M-L Foucault, L Thomas, S Goussard, B R Branchini, C Grillot-Courvalin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MicrobiotaHeliyon · 2022
    Review
  7. Cybergenetic control of microbial community composition.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Recent Progress in the Molecular Imaging of Tumor-Treating Bacteria.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Imaging with Reporter Genes: Has Its Promise Been Delivered?Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tracking Bioluminescent ETEC duringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M-L FoucaultUnité des Agents Antibactériens, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
L Thomas
S Goussard
B R Branchini
C Grillot-Courvalin
Institut Pasteur · FRConnecticut College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is emerging as a powerful tool for real-time monitoring of infections in living animals. However, since luciferases are oxygenases, it has been suggested that the requirement for oxygen may limit the use of BLI in anaerobic environments, such as the lumen of the gut. Strains of Escherichia coli harboring the genes for either the bacterial luciferase from Photorhabdus luminescens or the PpyRE-TS and PpyGR-TS firefly luciferase mutants of Photinus pyralis (red and green thermostable P. pyralis luciferase mutants, respectively) have been engineered and used to monitor intestinal colonization in the streptomycin-treated mouse model. There was excellent correlation between the bioluminescence signal measured in the feces (R2=0.98) or transcutaneously in the abdominal region of whole animals (R2=0.99) and the CFU counts in the feces of bacteria harboring the luxABCDE operon. Stability in vivo of the bioluminescence signal was achieved by constructing plasmid pAT881(pGB2OmegaPamiluxABCDE), which allowed long-term monitoring of intestinal colonization without the need for antibiotic selection for plasmid maintenance. Levels of intestinal colonization by various strains of E. coli could be compared directly by simple recording of the bioluminescence signal in living animals. The difference in spectra of light emission of the PpyRE-TS and PpyGR-TS firefly luciferase mutants and dual bioluminescence detection allowed direct in vitro and in vivo quantification of two bacterial populations by measurement of red and green emitted signals and thus monitoring of the two populations simultaneously. This system offers a simple and direct method to study in vitro and in vivo competition between mutants and the parental strain. BLI is a useful tool to study intestinal colonization.

Indexed as

LuminescenceAnimalsColony Count, MicrobialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGastrointestinal TractLuciferasesLuciferases, BacterialMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlasmidsRecombinant ProteinsStaining and LabelingWhole Body ImagingLuciferasesLuciferases, BacterialRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19880653
PMCPMC2798656
OpenAlexW2035010898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.