Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19878793›Full record

Trial reportJournal of vascular surgery2009

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results.

Brajesh K Lal, Thomas G Brott

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of vascular surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00004732 (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00004732 nacompletednot on this map

Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2000 to 2016Enrolled2,502ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Stroke, Carotid Stenosis, Cerebral InfarctionArmsCarotid Endarterectomy (CEA), Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Intraprocedural and Delayed Plaque Protrusion in Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Dual-Layer Metallic Stent.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Safety of the transradial approach to carotid stenting.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
  9. Quality Assurance for Carotid Stenting in the CREST-2 Registry.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brajesh K LalDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, USA.
Thomas G Brott
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting TrialR01NS038384 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BROTT, THOMAS G · 1999 to 2010
$40.7M
Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial: Long Term Follow-upU01NS038384 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BROTT, THOMAS G, SHEFFET, ALICE J · 2011 to 2016
$15.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS 038384NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038384NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS038384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST) completed randomization on July 18, 2008. Sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the trial has enrolled 2,522 participants across North America and is the largest randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It is also the largest RCT to assess carotid revascularization in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis. Conventional-risk patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (> or =50% by angiography, > or =70% by ultrasound) or asymptomatic carotid stenosis (> or =60% by angiography, > or =70% by ultrasound) were randomized to both treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio. Eligibility criteria for CREST were similar to those of the previous NINDS-sponsored CEA RCTs. The investigational devices used in the CAS arm of the study are the RX Acculink stent and the RX Accunet embolic protection system, (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, Calif). The primary aim is to contrast the efficacy of CAS versus CEA in preventing stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality during a 30-day peri-procedural period, and ipsilateral stroke over the follow-up period (extending up to four years). The secondary aims are to contrast the efficacy of CAS and CEA in men and women, the restenosis rates of the two procedures, health-related quality of life, and cost effectiveness of CAS and CEA. The conclusion of enrollment in CREST marks the end of a long recruitment period from 117 community and academic hospital centers across the United States and Canada. Each surgeon and interventionalist underwent a rigorous credentialing process that included performance-assessment of prior CEA and CAS procedures. Credentialing of interventionalists also included a review of additional CAS procedures enrolled into a CREST lead-in phase prior to entering patients into the randomized trial; 1564 patients were enrolled in the lead-in, the final pathway for the largest credentialing effort to date for any clinical trial. CREST will provide long-term follow-up after carotid revascularization based on systematic ultrasonographic and neurologic surveillance, and on quality of life and cost-effectiveness comparisons between CAS and CEA in the setting of a RCT. We present a brief description of the CREST protocol, impediments that were overcome during the trial, salient results from the lead-in phase of the trial, a summary of enrollment activities and characteristics of the final cohort, and a timeline for anticipated results from the randomized phase.

Indexed as

Endarterectomy, CarotidStentsAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplastyCanadaCarotid StenosisClinical CompetenceCost-Benefit AnalysisCredentialingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProsthesis Design

Identifiers

PMID19878793
PMCPMC2914304
OpenAlexW2084260752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.