Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19877735›Full record

ReviewDrugs2009

Candida colonization and candiduria in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit.

Pierluigi Viale

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ISCCM Position Statement on the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Management of candiduria in hospitalized patients: a single-center study on the implementation of IDSA guidelines and factors affecting clinical decisions.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Insights into Candida tropicalis nosocomial infections and virulence factors.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierluigi VialeDepartment of Medical and Morphological Research, Medical School, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. pierluigi.viale@uniud.it
University of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical severity of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients and existing difficulties in timely diagnosis mean that early empirical therapy, based upon a strict clinical and epidemiological judgement, is required in intensive care unit patients. One school of thought is that the clinical severity and epidemiological burden of this disease warrant prophylaxis in all critically ill patients. In reality, however, there are still many open-ended questions with regard to which variables are most apt for selection of patients requiring prophylactic or empirical treatment. As a consequence of a consistently significant correlation between colonization (one or more Candida-positive cultures from non-sterile sites) and subsequent infection, colonization remains the most universally accepted predictive variable with regard to invasive candidiasis. This is particularly true for high density colonization. It has not yet been clarified whether colonization can be used in isolation to identify high-risk patients or if it should be combined with other variables indicating high risk. Additionally, there is still a debate surrounding the question as to whether determination of multisite colonization is required, or whether detecting colonization at one or two specific sites is sufficient for the identification of high-risk patients. From a practical perspective, candiduria (a frequent finding in critically ill patients) appears one of the most promising parameters with regard to single-site assessment, owing to easy sampling procedures. Definitive evidence of a correlation between candiduria and invasive candidiasis is currently still lacking, as the few published studies thus far have yielded conflicting results. It is, however, apparent that candiduria can be reliably considered a surrogate marker of high density of colonization, thereby potentially representing a more practical, less resource-intensive screening marker of heavy colonization and high risk of infection than is currently possible using parameters such as the multiple-site colonization index.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisHumansIntensive Care UnitsRisk FactorsUrinary Tract InfectionsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID19877735
OpenAlexW2090806418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.