Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19877722›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2009

Juvenile dermatomyositis: advances in pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment.

Adam M Huber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam M HuberIWK Health Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. adam.huber@iwk.nshealth.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare, presumably autoimmune illness that causes proximal muscle weakness and a variety of typical cutaneous features. The study of this illness has been hampered by its rarity but, in recent years, important developments have increased our understanding of JDM. Genetic factors are likely important in the pathogenesis of JDM. These include several Human Leukocyte Antigen alleles, in particular those associated with the 8.1 ancestral haplotype and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene 308 polymorphism. Microchimerism, activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and upregulation of type-1 interferon inducible genes also appear to play an important role in the pathogenesis of JDM. The study of JDM has also been limited by a lack of validated assessment tools. Recent work has validated the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire as measures of muscle strength and function, and the Cutaneous Assessment Tool as a measure of skin disease activity and damage. Development of core sets of tools that should be used in all JDM studies has also been an important step. The use of magnetic resonance imaging and novel laboratory assessments (such as type-1 interferon inducible gene products, peripheral blood B cell and natural killer cell numbers, and myositis-associated and myositis-specific autoantibodies) are also playing an increasing role in the diagnosis and assessment of JDM. Current treatment is with corticosteroids, frequently in combination with other medications such as methotrexate or intravenous gammaglobulin. Newer therapies, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and rituximab are currently being evaluated; it is not clear what role these medications will have in the future.

Indexed as

BiopsyDermatomyositisHumansLaboratoriesMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.