Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19877498›Full record

ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2009

Neurotoxicity of drugs of abuse--the case of methylenedioxyamphetamines (MDMA, ecstasy), and amphetamines.

Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, Joerg Daumann

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Astroglial correlates of neuropsychiatric disease: From astrocytopathy to astrogliosis.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. No evidence of subgroups found in amphetamine consumers in Iran.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2018
    Article
  13. Translational Biomarkers of Neurotoxicity: A Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Perspective on the Way Forward.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Keto amphetamine toxicity-focus on the redox reactivity of the cathinone designer drug mephedrone.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA): current perspectives.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. D1/NMDA receptors and concurrent methamphetamine+ HIV-1 Tat neurotoxicity.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-MayfrankDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Germany. e.gouzoulis@uni-koeln.de
Joerg Daumann
LVR-Klinik Köln · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecstasy (MDMA, 3,4-methylendioxymethamphetamine) and the stimulants methamphetamine (METH, speed) and amphetamine are popular drugs among young people, particularly in the dance scene. When given in high doses both MDMA and the stimulant amphetamines are clearly neurotoxic in laboratory animals. MDMA causes selective and persistent lesions of central serotonergic nerve terminals, whereas amphetamines damage both the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems. In recent years, the question of ecstasy-induced neurotoxicity and possible functional sequelae has been addressed in several studies in drug users. Despite large methodological problems, the bulk of evidence suggests residual alterations of serotonergic transmission in MDMA users, although at least partial recovery may occur after long-term abstinence. However, functional sequelae may persist even after longer periods of abstinence. To date, the most consistent findings associate subtle cognitive impairments with ecstasy use, particularly with memory. In contrast, studies on possible long-term neurotoxic effects of stimulant use have been relatively scarce. Preliminary evidence suggests that alterations of the dopaminergic system may persist even after years of abstinence from METH, and may be associated with deficits in motor and cognitive performance. In this paper, we will review the literature focusing on human studies.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersAmphetaminesAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalHumansNeurotoxinsN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineAmphetaminesNeurotoxinsN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID19877498
PMCPMC3181923
OpenAlexW1486304586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.