Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19877164›Full record

Trial reportResearch in nursing & health2009

Preliminary efficacy of a comprehensive HIV prevention intervention for abstinent adolescent girls: pilot study findings.

Dianne Morrison-Beedy, Michael P Carey, Susan M Seibold-Simpson, Yinglin Xia, Xin Tu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Research in nursing & health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Sorting through chickens and eggs: a longitudinal examination of the associations between attitudes, norms, and sexual risk behavior.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dianne Morrison-BeedySchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box SON, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Michael P Carey
Susan M Seibold-Simpson
Yinglin Xia
Xin Tu

Funding

Virology/Immunology CoreP30AI078498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEWHURST, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$14.6M
Maintaining Abstinence and Reducing HIV Risk in Adolescent GirlsR03NR010193 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MORRISON-BEEDY, DIANNE C · 2006 to 2007
$152k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI078498NINR NIH HHS NR010193NINR NIH HHS R03 NR010193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed and pilot-tested a comprehensive HIV prevention/sexual risk reduction intervention with 54 sexually abstinent girls and estimated the effect of the intervention on three antecedents of sexual risk behavior: information, motivation, and behavioral skills. Girls ages 14-18 were randomized into either (a) an AbsPlus intervention or (b) a structurally equivalent control group. Assessments were obtained at baseline and 3 months follow-up using audio computer assisted self-interview. The intervention resulted in a large effect for information (d = 1.11); small to large effects for the motivational measures (d = .34-.88), and a moderate effect for a measure of behavioral skills (d = .67). The results indicate that antecedents of sexual risk behavior change were improved by a gender-specific theoretically guided intervention.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSexual AbstinenceAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHIV InfectionsHumansMotivationPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationPsychology, Adolescent

Identifiers

PMID19877164
PMCPMC5624337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.