ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2009
Future classification of psychotic disorders.
Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Pathways Potentially Involved in Hallucinatory Experiences During Sleep Paralysis: The Emerging Role of β-Arrestin-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Understanding the Differential Impact of Vegetation Measures on Modeling the Association between Vegetation and Psychotic and Non-Psychotic Disorders in Toronto, Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The neuropharmacology of sleep paralysis hallucinations: serotonin 2A activation and a novel therapeutic drug.Psychopharmacology · 2018Review
- Psychosis in parkinsonism: an unorthodox approach.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Review
- Pharmacology of hallucinations: several mechanisms for one single symptom?BioMed research international · 2014Review
- [Deconstructing schizophrenia. Dimensional models or division into subtypes?].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Review
- A dimensional approach to the psychosis spectrum between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: the Schizo-Bipolar Scale.Schizophrenia research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reclassifying psychotic disorders in the upcoming revisions of the mental disorders section of ICD-10 and DSM-IV will first necessitate the development of a unified and operationalized definition of the term "psychosis". Ideally, such a definition would be harmonized between both groups of diagnostic classification systems and become part of a glossary of terms. Conceptually and based on epidemiological and some genetic work, incorporating dimensional criteria and criteria for prodromal high-risk symptoms may become feasible. Considering the currently available evidence from genetic, neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies, none seems yet sufficiently validated to warrant major changes. However, further research in these areas promises to yield important new insights which may become relevant for the classification of psychotic disorders in the near future. Given the rapid progress in these fields, regular updates of the classification criteria at shorter intervals than in the past may become necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19876681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.