Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19876678›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2009

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of negative symptoms in residual schizophrenia: rationale and design of a sham-controlled, randomized multicenter study.

Joachim Cordes, P Falkai, B Guse, A Hasan, T Schneider-Axmann, M Arends, G Winterer, W Wölwer, E Ben Sliman, M Ramacher and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Rationale and study design of a trial to assessContemporary clinical trials communications · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Joachim CordesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629 Düsseldorf, Germany. joachim.cordes@lvr.de
P Falkai
B Guse
A Hasan
T Schneider-Axmann
M Arends
G Winterer
W Wölwer
E Ben Sliman
M Ramacher
C Schmidt-Kraepelin
C Ohmann
B Langguth
M Landgrebe
P Eichhammer
E Frank
J Burger
G Hajak
M Rietschel
T Wobrock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current meta-analysis revealed small, but significant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. There is a need for further controlled, multicenter trials to assess the clinical efficacy of rTMS on negative symptoms in schizophrenia in a larger sample of patients. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled, rater- and patient-blind clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy of 3-week 10-Hz high frequency rTMS add on to antipsychotic therapy, 15 sessions per 3 weeks, 1,000 stimuli per session, stimulation intensity 110% of the individual motor threshold) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia, and to evaluate the effect during a 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint is a reduction of negative symptoms as assessed by the negative sum score of the positive and negative symptom score (PANSS). A sample size of 63 in each group will have 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.50. Data analysis will be based on the intention to treat population. The study will be conducted at three university hospitals in Germany. This study will provide information about the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of negative symptoms. In addition to psychopathology, other outcome measures such as neurocognition, social functioning, quality of life and neurobiological parameters will be assessed to investigate basic mechanisms of rTMS in schizophrenia. Main limitations of the trial are the potential influence of antipsychotic dosage changes and the difficulty to ensure adequate blinding.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSample SizeSchizophreniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.