Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19875657›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2010

Episcleral venous pressure responses to topical nitroprusside and N-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester.

David O Zamora, Jeffrey W Kiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of nitric oxide in murine conventional outflow physiology.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2015
    Article
  9. Effect of AR-13324 on episcleral venous pressure in Dutch belted rabbits.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of nitric oxide on anterior segment physiology in monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ciliary blood flow and aqueous humor production.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David O ZamoraDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA. kiel@uthscsa.edu
Jeffrey W Kiel
Ophthalmology Associates (United States) · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure homeostasisR01EY009702 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KIEL, JEFFREY W · 1992 to 2013
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY09702NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the episcleral venous pressure (EVP) responses to nitroprusside (NP) and L-NAME.

methodsIn anesthetized rabbits (n = 36), arterial pressure and IOP were measured by direct cannulation, and carotid blood flow and heart rate were measured with an ultrasound flowmeter and cardiotachometer. EVP was measured in two groups with a servonull system. Group 1 (n = 13) was given NP (50 microL, 10 mg/mL). Group 2 (n = 10) was given L-NAME (100 microL, 10 mg/mL) followed by NP (50 microL, 10 mg/mL). In group 3 (n = 13), fluorophotometric aqueous flow was measured before and after NP (100 microL, 10 mg/mL).

resultsSystemic parameters were unaffected by treatment in all groups. In group 1, NP increased EVP from 9.1 +/- 0.6 to 11.6 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (P < 0.01) and IOP from 18.7 +/- 1.4 to 23.9 +/- 1.6 mm Hg (P < 0.01). In group 2, L-NAME lowered EVP from 11.5 +/- 1.2 to 8.8 +/- 1.0 mm Hg (P < 0.01) and subsequent NP increased EVP to 13.9 +/- 1.7 mm Hg (P < 0.01 versus L-NAME and baseline). L-NAME decreased IOP from 20.8 +/- 1.7 to 16.7 +/- 1.8 mm Hg (P < 0.01), and then it increased to 20.7 +/- 1.3 mm Hg after NP (P < 0.01 versus L-NAME and P > 0.05 versus baseline). In group 3, NP increased IOP from 16.6 +/- 0.7 to 20.0 +/- 0.9 mm Hg (P < 0.01) but did not alter aqueous flow (2.65 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.3 microL/min, P > 0.05).

conclusionsBecause a topical NO donor raises EVP and a topical NO synthase inhibitor lowers EVP, the authors conclude that EVP is modulated by NO.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnimalsAqueous HumorBlood Flow VelocityEnzyme InhibitorsFluorophotometryHeart RateIntraocular PressureNG-Nitroarginine Methyl EsterNitroprussideRabbitsScleraVasodilator AgentsVenous PressureEnzyme InhibitorsNG-Nitroarginine Methyl EsterNitroprussideVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID19875657
PMCPMC2868440
OpenAlexW2019654866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.