ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2009
An alternative approach to medical genetics based on modern evolutionary biology. Part 4: HERVs in cancer.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of the human endogenous retrovirus ERV3-encoded Env-protein in human tissues using antibody-based proteomics.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2014Article
- HERVs expression in Autism Spectrum Disorders.PloS one · 2012Article
- Human endogenous retroviruses in multiple sclerosis: potential for novel neuro-pharmacological research.Current neuropharmacology · 2011Article
- The good viruses: viral mutualistic symbioses.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.