Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1986242›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1991

Suppression of ribosomal reinitiation at upstream open reading frames in amino acid-starved cells forms the basis for GCN4 translational control.

J P Abastado, P F Miller, B M Jackson, A G Hinnebusch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

J P AbastadoSection on Molecular Genetics of Lower Eukaryotes, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
P F Miller
B M Jackson
A G Hinnebusch
National Institute of Child Health · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GCN4 encodes a transcriptional activator of amino acid-biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is regulated at the translational level by upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in its mRNA leader. uORF4 (counting from the 5' end) is sufficient to repress GCN4 under nonstarvation conditions; uORF1 is required to overcome the inhibitory effect of uORF4 and stimulate GCN4 translation in amino acid-starved cells. Insertions of sequences with the potential to form secondary structure around uORF4 abolish derepression, indicating that ribosomes reach GCN4 by traversing uORF4 sequences rather than by binding internally to the GCN4 start site. By showing that wild-type regulation occurred even when uORF4 was elongated to overlap GCN4 by 130 nucleotides, we provide strong evidence that those ribosomes which translate GCN4 do so by ignoring the uORF4 AUG start codon. This conclusion is in accord with the fact that translation of a uORF4-lacZ fusion was lower in a derepressed gcd1 mutant than in a nonderepressible gcn2 strain. We also show that increasing the distance between uORF1 and uORF4 to the wild-type spacing that separates uORF1 from GCN4 specifically impaired the ability of uORF1 to derepress GCN4 translation. As expected, this alteration led to increased uORF4-lacZ translation in gcd1 cells. Our results suggest that under starvation conditions, a substantial fraction of ribosomes that translate uORF1 fail to reassemble the factors needed for reinitiation by the time they scan to uORF4, but become competent to reinitiate after scanning the additional sequences to GCN4. Under nonstarvation conditions, ribosomes would recover more rapidly from uORF1 translation, causing them all to reinitiate at uORF4 rather than at GCN4.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalPeptide Chain Initiation, TranslationalProtein KinasesRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAmino AcidsBase SequenceDNA, FungalDNA Mutational AnalysisFungal ProteinsHydrogen BondingMolecular Sequence DataMolecular StructureRibosomesRNA, MessengerAmino AcidsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsProtein KinasesRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID1986242
PMCPMC359655
OpenAlexW1899601083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.